Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37390075›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Eating disorder treatment in routine clinical care: A descriptive study examining treatment characteristics and short-term treatment outcomes among patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in Germany and Switzerland.

Kathrin Schopf, Silvia Schneider, Andrea Hans Meyer, Julia Lennertz, Nadine Humbel, Nadine-Messerli Bürgy, Andrea Wyssen, Esther Biedert, Bettina Isenschmid, Gabriella Milos and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kathrin SchopfMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-2588
Silvia SchneiderMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrea Hans MeyerDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Julia LennertzPraxis für Psychotherapie, Dortmund, Germany.
Nadine HumbelDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Nadine-Messerli BürgyDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Andrea WyssenUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0836-9817
Esther BiedertDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Bettina IsenschmidCenter for Eating Disorders and Obesity, Clinic Zofingen, Zofingen, Switzerland.
Gabriella MilosDepartment of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Malte ClaussenDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephan TrierPrivat Clinic Aadorf, Aadorf, Switzerland.
Katherina WhinyatesPrivat Clinic Schützen Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Dirk AdolphMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias TeismannMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Jürgen MargrafMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Hans-Jörg AssionDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, LWL-Klinik Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Bianca ÜberbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, LWL-Klinik Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Georg JuckelDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Judith MüllerChristoph-Dornier-Klinik for Psychotherapy, Münster, Germany.
Benedikt KlaukeChristoph-Dornier-Klinik for Psychotherapy, Münster, Germany.
Simone MunschDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This descriptive study examined patient characteristics, treatment characteristics, and short-term outcomes among patients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) in routine clinical care. Results for patients receiving full-time treatment were contrasted with results for patients receiving ambulatory treatment. Data of a clinical trial including 116 female patients (18-35 years) diagnosed with AN or BN were subjected to secondary analyses. Patients were voluntarily admitted to one of nine treatment facilities in Germany and Switzerland. Patients received cognitive-behavioral interventions in accordance with the national clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of EDs under routine clinical care conditions, either as full-time treatment or ambulatory treatment. Assessments were conducted after admission and three months later. Assessments included a clinician-administered diagnostic interview (DIPS), body-mass-index (BMI), ED pathology (EDE-Q), depressive symptoms (BDI-II), symptoms of anxiety (BAI), and somatic symptoms (SOMS). Findings showed that treatment intensity differed largely by setting and site, partly due to national health insurance policies. Patients with AN in full-time treatment received on average 65 psychotherapeutic sessions and patients with BN in full-time treatment received on average 38 sessions within three months. In comparison, patients with AN or BN in ambulatory treatment received 8-9 sessions within the same time. Full-time treatment was associated with substantial improvements on all measured variables for both women with AN (d = .48-.83) and BN (d = .48-.81). Despite the relatively small amount of psychotherapeutic sessions, ambulatory treatment was associated with small increases in BMI (d = .37) among women with AN and small improvements on all measured variables among women with BN (d = .27-.43). For women with AN, reduction in ED pathology were positively related to the number of psychotherapeutic sessions received. Regardless of diagnosis and treatment setting, full recovery of symptoms was rarely achieved within three months (recovery rates ranged between 0 and 4.4%). The present study shows that a considerable amount of patients with EDs improved after CBT-based ED treatment in routine clinical care within three months after admission. Intensive full-time treatment may be particularly effective in quickly improving ED-related pathology, although full remission of symptoms is typically not achieved. A small amount of ambulatory sessions may already produce considerable improvements in BN pathology and weight gain among women with AN. As patient characteristics and treatment intensity differed largely between settings, results should not be interpreted as superiority of one treatment setting over another. Furthermore, this study shows that treatment intensity is quite heterogeneous, indicating the possibility for increasing effectiveness in the treatment of EDs in routine clinical care.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBulimia NervosaFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleGermanyHumansSwitzerlandTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37390075
PMCPMC10313003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.