Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389945›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Examination of Text Message Plans and Baseline Usage of Families Enrolled in a Text Message Influenza Vaccine Reminder Trial: Survey Study.

Chelsea S Wynn, Alexander G Fiks, Russell Localio, Justine Shults, Ekaterina Nekrasova, Laura P Shone, Alessandra Torres, Miranda Griffith, Rebecca Unger, Leigh Ann Ware and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea S WynnDivision of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-4073
Alexander G FiksDepartment of Pediatrics, Clinical Futures & PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6525-8764
Russell LocalioDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-851X
Justine ShultsDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0266-0980
Ekaterina NekrasovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Clinical Futures & PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3405-7919
Laura P ShonePrimary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8954-5724
Alessandra TorresPrimary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4479-9219
Miranda GriffithPrimary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2032-0718
Rebecca UngerNorthwestern Children's Practice, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7339-708X
Leigh Ann WareBuilding Blocks Pediatrics, Pleasanton, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7505-9247
Mary Kate KellyDepartment of Pediatrics, Clinical Futures & PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1852-457X
Melissa S StockwellDivision of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-7247
American Academy of Pediatrics · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USNorthwestern Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health (mHealth) is quickly expanding as a method of health promotion, but some interventions may not be familiar or comfortable for potential users. SMS text messaging has been investigated as a low-cost, accessible way to provide vaccine reminders. Most (97%) US adults own a cellphone and of those adults most use SMS text messaging. However, understanding patterns of SMS text message plan type and use in diverse primary care populations needs more investigation.

objectiveWe sought to use a survey to examine baseline SMS text messaging and data plan patterns among families willing to accept SMS text message vaccine reminders.

methodsAs part of a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded national study (Flu2Text) conducted during the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 influenza seasons, families of children needing a second seasonal influenza vaccine dose were recruited in pediatric primary care offices at the time of their first dose. Practices were from the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Columbia University. A survey was administered via telephone (Season 1) or electronically (Season 2) at enrollment. Standardized (adjusted) proportions for SMS text message plan type and texting frequency were calculated using logistic regression that was adjusted for child and caregiver demographics.

resultsResponses were collected from 1439 participants (69% of enrolled). The mean caregiver age was 32 (SD 6) years, and most children (n=1355, 94.2%) were aged 6-23 months. Most (n=1357, 94.3%) families were English-speaking. Most (n=1331, 92.8%) but not all participants had an unlimited SMS text messaging plan and sent or received texts at least once daily (n=1313, 91.5%). SMS text messaging plan type and use at baseline was uniform across most but not all subgroups. However, there were some differences in the study population's SMS text messaging plan type and usage. Caregivers who wanted Spanish SMS text messages were less likely than those who chose English to have an unlimited SMS text messaging plan (n=61, 86.7% vs n=1270, 94%; risk difference -7.2%, 95% CI -27.1 to -1.8). There were no significant differences in having an unlimited plan associated with child's race, ethnicity, age, health status, insurance type, or caregiver education level. SMS text messaging use at baseline was not uniform across all subgroups. Nearly three-quarters (n=1030, 71.9%) of participants had received some form of SMS text message from their doctor's office; most common were appointment reminders (n=1014, 98.4%), prescription (n=300, 29.1%), and laboratory notifications (n=117, 11.4%). Even the majority (n=64, 61.5%) of those who did not have unlimited plans and who texted less than daily (n=72, 59%) reported receipt of these SMS text messages.

conclusionsIn this study, most participants had access to unlimited SMS text messaging plans and texted at least once daily. However, infrequent texting and lack of access to an unlimited SMS text messaging plan did not preclude enrolling to receive SMS text message reminders in pediatric primary care settings.

Indexed as

influenza vaccinemHealthmobile phonepediatricprimary carePROSreminderstext message

Identifiers

PMID37389945
PMCPMC10365607
OpenAlexW4323790356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.