Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389873›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Comparison of Injuries Associated With Electric Scooters, Motorbikes, and Bicycles in France, 2019-2022.

Arthur James, Anatole Harrois, Paer-Selim Abback, Jean Denis Moyer, Caroline Jeantrelle, Jean-Luc Hanouz, Mathieu Boutonnet, Thomas Geeraerts, Anne Godier, Julien Pottecher and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Arthur JamesSorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Anatole HarroisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Bicêtre Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Paer-Selim AbbackDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Tours, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Jean Denis MoyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Caen, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Caroline JeantrelleDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Université de Paris, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Jean-Luc HanouzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Caen, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Mathieu BoutonnetIntensive Care Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Percy, Clamart, France.
Thomas GeeraertsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Toulouse University Hospital, University Toulouse 3 - Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Anne GodierDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Julien PottecherHôpital de Hautepierre, Service d'Anesthésie, Réanimation & Médecine Péri-Opératoire - Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, FMTS, EA3072, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Delphine Garrigue-HuetCHU Lille, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, F-59000 Lille, France.
Jean CotteIntensive Care Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France.
Jean PasqueronDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Est Créteil, France.
Arnaud FoucrierDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Université de Paris, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Tobias GaussAnaesthesia Critical Care, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, 38700 Grenoble, France.
Mathieu RauxSorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique; AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France.
French Observatory for Major Trauma (TraumaBase)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Electric scooter (e-scooter) use is increasing in France and in many urban environments worldwide. Yet little is known about injuries associated with use of e-scooters. Objective: To describe characteristics and outcomes of major trauma involving e-scooters. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter cohort study was conducted in France using the national major trauma registry between January 1, 2019, and December 20, 2022. All patients admitted to a participating major trauma center following a road traffic crash (RTC) involving an e-scooter, a bicycle, or a motorbike were included. Exposure: Included patients were compared according to the 3 mechanisms. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was trauma severity as defined by the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Secondary outcomes included the trends of the number of patients per year, a comparison of the RTC epidemiologic factors, injury severity, resources used, and in-hospital outcomes. Results: A total of 5233 patients involved in RTCs were admitted (median age, 33 [IQR, 24-48] years; 4629 [88.5%] men; median ISS, 13 [IQR, 8-22]). The population included 229 e-scooter RTCs (4.4%), 4094 motorbike RTCs (78.2%), and 910 bicycle RTCs (17.4%). The number of patients treated following e-scooter RTCs increased by 2.8-fold in 4 years (from 31 in 2019 to 88 in 2022), while bicycle RTCs increased by 1.2-fold and motorbike RTCs decreased by 0.9-fold. At admission, 36.7% of e-scooter users had a blood alcohol content higher than the legal threshold (n = 84) and 22.5% wore a protective helmet (n = 32). Among e-scooter RTCs, 102 patients (45.5%) had an ISS of 16 or higher. This proportion was similar for patients with motorbike RTCs (1557 [39.7%]; P = .10) and bicycle RTCs (411 [47.3%]; P = .69). With a proportion of 25.9% (n = 50), patients with e-scooter RTCs had twice as many severe traumatic brain injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) as motorbike RTCs (445 [11.8%]) and a proportion comparable to bicycle RTCs (174 [22.1%]). The mortality of e-scooter RTCs was 9.2% (n = 20), compared with 5.2% (n = 196) (P = .02) for motorbikes and 10.0% (n = 84) (P = .82) for bicycles. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that trauma involving e-scooters in France has significantly increased over the past 4 years. These patients presented with injury profiles as severe as those of individuals who experienced bicycle or motorbike RTCs, with a higher proportion of severe traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticOff-Road Motor VehiclesAdultBicyclingCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID37389873
PMCPMC10314314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.