Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389799›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2023

Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report.

Genki Watanabe, Shouichi Satou, Mao Tsuru, Masashi Momiyama, Kentaro Nakajima, Atsuki Nagao, Hitoshi Satodate, Takashi Muramoto, Ken Ohata, Tamaki Noie

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Genki WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shouichi SatouDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. syouichi.sato@east.ntt.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-2811
Mao TsuruDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi MomiyamaDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro NakajimaDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuki NagaoDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi SatodateDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi MuramotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken OhataDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tamaki NoieDepartment of Surgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
NTT Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.

Indexed as

Duodenal NeoplasmsDuodenal UlcerAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalDuodenumFemaleHumansPancreasPancreaticoduodenectomyTreatment OutcomeDuodenal perforationPancreas-sparing partial duodenectomyPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID37389799
OpenAlexW4382631433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.