Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389782›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

The Prevalence of Menstrual Cycle Disorders and Menstrual Cycle-Related Symptoms in Female Athletes: A Systematic Literature Review.

Bernadette Cherianne Taim, Ciarán Ó Catháin, Michèle Renard, Kirsty Jayne Elliott-Sale, Sharon Madigan, Niamh Ní Chéilleachair

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07766577 (Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07766577 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Menstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionnaire in Female Athletes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiruni UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsMenstrual Cycle, AthletesArmsMenstrual Cycle Knowledge Questionanire, Menstrual Symptom Scale, Health Literacy in Sports
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Considerations of Fertility in Elite Sportswomen: A Narrative Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernadette Cherianne TaimDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, N37 HD68, Westmeath, Ireland. btaim@research.ait.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-1869
Ciarán Ó CatháinDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, N37 HD68, Westmeath, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8526-8924
Michèle RenardDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, N37 HD68, Westmeath, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4517-1316
Kirsty Jayne Elliott-SaleDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, 99 Oxford Road, M1 7EL, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-5099
Sharon MadiganSport Ireland Institute, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8709-9941
Niamh Ní ChéilleachairDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, N37 HD68, Westmeath, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-0258
Shannon Applied Biotechnology Centre · IEAthlone Institute of Technology · IEManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

Irish Research Council GOIPG/2022/2230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenstrual cycle (MC) disorders and MC-related symptoms can have debilitating effects on the health and performance of female athletes. As the participation of women in sports continues to increase, understanding the prevalence of a range of MC disorders and MC-related symptoms may guide preventive strategies to protect the health and optimise the performance of female athletes.

objectiveTo examine the prevalence of MC disorders and MC-related symptoms among female athletes who are not using hormonal contraceptives and evaluate the assessment methods used to identify MC disorders and MC-related symptoms.

methodsThis systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Six databases were searched until September 2022 for all original research that reported the prevalence of MC disorders and/or MC-related symptoms in athletes not using hormonal contraceptives, which included the definitions of the MC disorders examined, and the assessment methods used. MC disorders included amenorrhoea, anovulation, dysmenorrhoea, heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), luteal phase deficiency (LPD), oligomenorrhoea, premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). MC-related symptoms included any affective and physical symptoms related to the MC that do not cause significant personal, interpersonal or functional impairment. The prevalence data across eligible studies were combined, and all studies were qualitatively synthesised to evaluate the assessment methods and tools used to identify MC disorders and MC-related symptoms. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist.

resultsSixty studies involving 6380 athletes were included. A wide range of prevalence was observed for all types of MC disorders, with a dearth of data on anovulation and LPD. Based on pooled data, dysmenorrhoea (32.3%; range 7.8-85.6%) was the most prevalent MC disorder. Studies reporting MC-related symptoms mostly examined the premenstrual and menstruation phases, where affective symptoms appeared more prevalent than physical symptoms. A larger proportion of athletes reported symptoms during the initial days of menstruation compared with the premenstrual phase. MC disorders and MC-related symptoms were retrospectively assessed using self-report methods in 90.0% of studies. Most studies (76.7%) in this review were graded as moderate quality. DISCUSSION: MC disorders and MC-related symptoms are commonplace among female athletes, warranting further research examining their impact on performance and preventive/management strategies to optimise athlete health. To increase the quality of future studies, researchers should adopt standardised definitions of MC disorders and assessment methods such as a combination of calendar counting, urinary ovulation tests and a mid-luteal phase serum progesterone measurement when assessing menstrual function. Similarly, standardised diagnostic criteria should be used when examining MC disorders such as HMB, PMS and PMDD. Practically, implementing prospective cycle monitoring that includes ovulation testing, mid-luteal blood sampling (where feasible) and symptom logging throughout the MC could support athletes and practitioners to promptly identify and manage MC disorders and/or MC-related symptoms.

trial registrationThis review has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021268757).

Indexed as

AnovulationPremenstrual Dysphoric DisorderPremenstrual SyndromeAthletesContraceptive AgentsDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleMenstruation DisturbancesPrevalenceProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID37389782
OpenAlexW4382631937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.