SynthesisOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
The clinical efficacy of the allogenic demineralized dentin matrix graft for implant placement: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-incorporation of Phosphorus and zinc into wollastonite ceramic granules synergically facilitating thin-walled structures regeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of autologous particulate dentin graft for alveolar ridge preservation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Types of Bone Substitutes and Their Application in Regenerative Medicine: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Review
- Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Allogenic Demineralized Dentin Matrix (Allo-DDM) has been introduced as a new grafting material, and several investigations were conducted, showing its efficacy in bone augmentation. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the Allo-DDM, revealing its clinical performance when used for implant placement procedures.
methodsThis study is registered in the PROSPERO database (number: CRD42021264885, date: 30/7/2021). Four databases, as well as the grey literature, were searched, selecting human studies where the Allo-DDM was applied to augment implant-recipient sites.
resultsSix articles were included. The total number of implants placed in Allo-DDM-grafted sites was 149. Mean implant stability quotient values (ISQ) were 60.4 and 68.67 for the primary and secondary ISQ, respectively (data from one study). Buccal marginal bone loss around implants was approximately 1.46 mm after 24 months of prosthetic loading (data from one study). Two studies documented a total of 6 cases of dehiscence of the grated area, however, not affecting early implant success. Histological findings from all studies showed new bone formation around the graft particles.
conclusionA low number of publications are available, presenting only preliminary results, thus the long-term success/survival of implants still needs to be further explored. Moreover, the possibility of bony dehiscence with the use of this material should be investigated. Within these limitations, the Allo-DDM could be a possible alternative to other grafting materials used for bone augmentation and implant placement. Nevertheless, considering this limited evidence, future studies are necessary to confirm this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37389695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.