ArticleEuropean radiology2023
A deep learning method for the automated assessment of paradoxical pulsation after myocardial infarction using multicenter cardiac MRI data.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Early warning and stratification of the elderly cardiopulmonary dysfunction-related diseases: multicentre prospective study protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe current study aimed to explore a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model that integrates multidimensional CMR data to accurately identify LV paradoxical pulsation after reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention with isolated anterior infarction.
methodsA total of 401 participants (311 patients and 90 age-matched volunteers) were recruited for this prospective study. The two-dimensional UNet segmentation model of the LV and classification model for identifying paradoxical pulsation were established using the DCNN model. Features of 2- and 3-chamber images were extracted with 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D ResNets with masks generated by a segmentation model. Next, the accuracy of the segmentation model was evaluated using the Dice score and classification model by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and confusion matrix. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the physicians in training and DCNN models were compared using the DeLong method.
resultsThe DCNN model showed that the AUCs for the detection of paradoxical pulsation were 0.97, 0.91, and 0.83 in the training, internal, and external testing cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). The 2.5-dimensional model established using the end-systolic and end-diastolic images combined with 2-chamber and 3-chamber images was more efficient than the 3D model. The discrimination performance of the DCNN model was better than that of physicians in training (p < 0.05).
conclusionsCompared to the model trained by 2-chamber or 3-chamber images alone or 3D multiview, our 2.5D multiview model can combine the information of 2-chamber and 3-chamber more efficiently and obtain the highest diagnostic sensitivity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A deep convolutional neural network model that integrates 2-chamber and 3-chamber CMR images can identify LV paradoxical pulsation which correlates with LV thrombosis, heart failure, ventricular tachycardia after reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention with isolated anterior infarction. KEY POINTS: • The epicardial segmentation model was established using the 2D UNet based on end-diastole 2- and 3-chamber cine images. • The DCNN model proposed in this study had better performance for discriminating LV paradoxical pulsation accurately and objectively using CMR cine images after anterior AMI compared to the diagnosis of physicians in training. • The 2.5-dimensional multiview model combined the information of 2- and 3-chamber efficiently and obtained the highest diagnostic sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37389610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.