ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
A Survey on the Management of Anomalous Aortic Origins of the Coronary Arteries.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of patients with an anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) remains controversial despite the publication of the 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) expert guidelines. We surveyed the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery and the Pediheart.net online community regarding their care of patients with anomalous origins of the right or left coronary from the opposite cusp with inter-arterial courses and compared them to the AATS guidelines. We received 111 complete responses. Four notable variations from the AATS recommendations were identified. Respondents were more likely to use ECG exercise testing than the stress imaging recommended in the AATS guidelines. For a 16-year-old with AAOCA, recommendations for surgery generally followed the AATS guidelines. However, for asymptomatic left AAOCA without signs of ischemia on stress imaging, only 69.4% felt surgery was appropriate or somewhat appropriate. In the setting of a 16-year-old with right AAOCA free from signs or symptoms of ischemia, respondents were more likely to recommend surgery if the patient was a competitive athlete, a topic not directly addressed in the AATS guidelines. After surgical treatment of AAOCA, only 24% of respondents recommended lifelong antiplatelet therapy despite recommendations for this in the AATS guidelines. Respondents recommendations were generally consistent with the 2017 AATS guidelines but with important variations in the use of stress imaging, indications for surgery in asymptomatic left AAOCA, the impact of identification as a competitive athlete and duration of postoperative antiplatelet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37389591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.