Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389545›Full record

ReviewInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Gene Therapy for Retinal Degenerative Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Selina Drag, Farokh Dotiwala, Arun K Upadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PreclinicalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of AAV5-Id3 Gene Therapy to Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Surgical Approaches to Retinal Gene Therapy: 2025 Update.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. A Practical Guide to Genetic Eye Conditions for Paediatricians.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selina DragOcugen, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States.
Farokh DotiwalaOcugen, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States.
Arun K UpadhyayOcugen, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since long before the first approval of gene therapy for retinal disease, ocular gene therapy has captured the hopes of patients, clinicians, and scientists alike. Indeed, the retina provides a unique system for studying and treating ocular diseases, and it holds the distinction as the first tissue targeted by an approved gene therapy for inherited disorders in the United States. There are many methods for addressing genetic diseases in the eyes using a wide range of potential delivery systems and vectors. However, despite the immense progress over the last several decades, both old and new challenges remain, such as the long-term effects of treatments, immunogenicity, targeting, and manufacturing. This review provides a discussion of the history of ocular gene therapy, the various gene therapy approaches, methods to deliver a gene directly to ocular tissues (including both routes of administration and vectors), challenges to ocular gene therapy, the current clinical trial landscape, and future directions of the field.

Indexed as

Retinal DegenerationGenetic TherapyHumansRetina

Identifiers

PMID37389545
PMCPMC10318594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.