Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389530›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2023

A Nationwide Sample of Adolescents and Young Adults Share Where They Would Go Online for Abortion Information After Dobbs v. Jackson.

Bianca A Allison, Renee M Odom, Kinsey Vear, Andrea J Hoopes, Julie Maslowsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Young People's Trust in Digital Sexual Healthcare: A Narrative Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Characteristics and Circumstances of Adolescents Obtaining Abortions in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bianca A AllisonDivision of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: bianca.allison@unchealth.unc.edu.
Renee M OdomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois; Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Kinsey VearUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Andrea J HoopesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Julie MaslowskyDivision of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

CATALyST: Consortium for Applied Training to Advance the Learning health system with Scholars/TraineesK12HS026369 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LOZANO, PAULA, RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Demography, Health, and Contraceptive Use of Repeat Teenage MothersK01HD091416 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MASLOWSKY, JULIE M · 2017 to 2021
$652k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026369NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR004507NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD091416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiven the changing landscape of abortion access, we sought to understand where adolescents and young adults retrieve information about abortion online.

methodsA nationwide sample (n = 638) of 14- to 24-year-olds responded to a qualitative text message survey in July 2022 regarding websites or social media they would use for abortion-related information. Open-ended responses were coded and analyzed for themes.

resultsForty-six percent of respondents (n = 234) named specific websites or accounts of known organizations or individuals; 14% named general clinical or governmental resources; and 13% named social media platforms. Eight percent expressed skeptical sentiments about online abortion information. 17% (n = 99) said they were not sure or did not have an opinion. DISCUSSION: Many adolescents and young adults could name an online resource for abortion information, but some are not aware of specific resources, underscoring a need to elevate reputable sources and provide guidance on how and where to look for accurate online abortion-related information.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousAdolescentFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAbortionAccessAdolescentsLawLegalMediaOnlineSourcesTechnology

Identifiers

PMID37389530
PMCPMC10755065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.