ArticleTravel behaviour & society2023
Applying an interpretable machine learning framework to study mobility inequity in the recovery phase of COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Travel behaviour & society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The persistence of behavioral disparities post-pandemic: Insights from activity time series data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis that also fuels the pervasive social inequity in the United States. Existing studies have extensively analyzed the inequity issues on mobility across different demographic groups during the lockdown phase. However, it is unclear whether the mobility inequity is perennial and will continue into the mobility recovery phase. This study utilizes ride-hailing data from Jan 1st, 2019, to Mar 31st, 2022, in Chicago to analyze the impact of various factors, such as demographic, land use, and transit connectivity, on mobility inequity in the different recovery phases. Instead of commonly used statistical methods, this study leverages advanced time-series clustering and an interpretable machine learning algorithm. The result demonstrates that inequity still exists in the mobility recovery phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the degree of mobility inequity in different recovery phases is varied. Furthermore, mobility inequity is more likely to exist in the census tract with more families without children, lower health insurance coverage, inflexible workstyle, more African Americans, higher poverty rate, fewer commercial land use, and higher Gini index. This study aims to further the understanding of the social inequity issue during the mobility recovery phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and help governments propose proper policies to tackle the unequal impact of the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.