ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Age-integrated artificial intelligence framework for sleep stage classification and obstructive sleep apnea screening.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Electroencephalogram in Sleep Apnea Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Big data approaches for novel mechanistic insights on sleep and circadian rhythms: a workshop summary.Sleep · 2025Article
- The Impact of Diagnostic Imaging on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Feedback from a Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis and Screening Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sleep is an essential function to sustain a healthy life, and sleep dysfunction can cause various physical and mental issues. In particular, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most common sleep disorders and, if not treated in a timely manner, OSA can lead to critical problems such as hypertension or heart disease. Methods: The first crucial step in evaluating individuals' quality of sleep and diagnosing sleep disorders is to classify sleep stages using polysomnographic (PSG) data including electroencephalography (EEG). To date, such sleep stage scoring has been mainly performed manually Results: The performance of the younger age-specific group model was similar to that of the general model (and even higher than the general model at certain stages), but the performance of the older age-specific group model was rather low, suggesting that bias in individual variables, such as age bias, should be considered during model training. Our integrated model yielded an accuracy of 73% in sleep stage classification and 73% in OSA screening when MLP algorithm was applied, which indicates that patients with OSA could be screened with the corresponding accuracy level only with sleep EEG without respiration-related measures. Discussion: The current outcomes demonstrate the feasibility of AI-based computational studies that when combined with advances in wearable devices and relevant technologies could contribute to personalized medicine by not only assessing an individuals' sleep status conveniently at home but also by alerting them to the risk of sleep disorders and enabling early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.