Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389309›Full record

ReviewSafety and health at work2023

Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations.

Louis Galey, Sabyne Audignon, Patrick Brochard, Maximilien Debia, Aude Lacourt, Pierre Lambert, Olivier Le Bihan, Laurent Martinon, Sébastien Bau, Olivier Witschger and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Safety and health at work, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adverse effects of nanoparticles on humans.Journal of occupational health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louis GaleyUniversity Paris Nanterre, Department of Psychology, LAPPS, Team TE2O, Nanterre, France.
Sabyne AudignonUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, UMR1219, EPICENE Team, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick BrochardUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, UMR1219, EPICENE Team, Bordeaux, France.
Maximilien DebiaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique (CReSP), Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Aude LacourtUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, UMR1219, EPICENE Team, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre LambertCARSAT Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier Le BihanINERIS, Verneuil en Halatte, France.
Laurent MartinonService Parisien de Santé Environnementale, Laboratoire Amiante, Fibres et Particules, Ville de Paris, Paris, France.
Sébastien BauINRS, Laboratoire de Métrologie des Aérosols, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy, France.
Olivier WitschgerINRS, Laboratoire de Métrologie des Aérosols, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy, France.
Alain GarrigouUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, UMR1219, EPICENE Team, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many industrial sectors, workers are exposed to manufactured or unintentionally emitted airborne nanoparticles (NPs). To develop prevention and enhance knowledge surrounding exposure, it has become crucial to achieve a consensus on how to assess exposure to airborne NPs by inhalation in the workplace. Here, we review the literature presenting recommendations on assessing occupational exposure to NPs. The 23 distinct strategies retained were analyzed in terms of the following points: target NPs, objectives, steps, "measurement strategy" (instruments, physicochemical analysis, and data processing), "contextual information" presented, and "work activity" analysis. The robustness (consistency of information) and practical aspects (detailed methodology) of each strategy were estimated. The objectives and methodological steps varied, as did the measurement techniques. Strategies were essentially based on NPs measurement, but improvements could be made to better account for "contextual information" and "work activity". Based on this review, recommendations for an operational strategy were formulated, integrating the work activity with the measurement to provide a more complete assessment of situations leading to airborne NP exposure. These recommendations can be used with the objective of producing homogeneous exposure data for epidemiological purposes and to help improve prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Contextual informationMeasurement strategyNanoparticlesTiered approachWork activity

Identifiers

PMID37389309
PMCPMC10300466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.