Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389290›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

A conceptual framework for the dynamic modeling of time-resolved phenotypes for sets of genotype-environment-management combinations: a model library.

George A K van Voorn, Martin P Boer, Sandra Huynh Truong, Nicholas A Friedenberg, Shota Gugushvili, Ryan McCormick, Daniela Bustos Korts, Carlos D Messina, Fred A van Eeuwijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward a general framework for AI-enabled prediction in crop improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

George A K van VoornBiometris, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Martin P BoerBiometris, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Sandra Huynh TruongResearch & Development, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Nicholas A FriedenbergResearch & Development, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Shota GugushviliBiometris, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ryan McCormickResearch & Development, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Daniela Bustos KortsBiometris, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Carlos D MessinaResearch & Development, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States.
Fred A van EeuwijkBiometris, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dynamic crop growth models are an important tool to predict complex traits, like crop yield, for modern and future genotypes in their current and evolving environments, as those occurring under climate change. Phenotypic traits are the result of interactions between genetic, environmental, and management factors, and dynamic models are designed to generate the interactions producing phenotypic changes over the growing season. Crop phenotype data are becoming increasingly available at various levels of granularity, both spatially (landscape) and temporally (longitudinal, time-series) from proximal and remote sensing technologies. Methods: Here we propose four phenomenological process models of limited complexity based on differential equations for a coarse description of focal crop traits and environmental conditions during the growing season. Each of these models defines interactions between environmental drivers and crop growth (logistic growth, with implicit growth restriction, or explicit restriction by irradiance, temperature, or water availability) as a minimal set of constraints without resorting to strongly mechanistic interpretations of the parameters. Differences between individual genotypes are conceptualized as differences in crop growth parameter values. Results: We demonstrate the utility of such low-complexity models with few parameters by fitting them to longitudinal datasets from the simulation platform APSIM-Wheat involving Discussion: A combination of low-complexity phenomenological models covering a small set of major limiting environmental factors may be a useful forecasting tool for crop growth under genotypic and environmental variation.

Indexed as

crop growth modeldynamic modelgenotype by environment by management interactionsmodel selectionordinary differential equationphenomenological modelphenotypingprocess-based model

Identifiers

PMID37389290
PMCPMC10303120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.