Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2023

The Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling - experiences from 10 years of application of a health impact assessment tool in policy and practice.

Sonja Kahlmeier, Nick Cavill, Meelan Thondoo, Harry Rutter, Thiago Herick de Sa, Francesca Racioppi, Thomas Gotschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonja KahlmeierDepartment of Health, Campus Zurich, Swiss Distance University of Applied Science (Fernfachhochschule Schweiz FFHS), Zurich, Switzerland.
Nick CavillCavill Associates Ltd Bramhall, Stockport, United Kingdom.
Meelan ThondooGlobal Diet and Physical Activity Research Group, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Harry RutterDepartment of Social & Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Thiago Herick de SaHealthy Urban Environments, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Francesca RacioppiEuropean Centre for Environment and Health, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas GotschiCollege of Design, School of Planning, Public Policy and Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States Of America.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, walking and cycling have moved into the focus as promising approaches to achieve public health, sustainable transport, climate goals and better urban resilience. However, they are only realistic transport and activity options for a large proportion of the population when they are safe, inclusive and convenient. One way to increase their recognition in transport policy is the inclusion of health impacts of walking and cycling into transport economic appraisals. Methods: The Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling calculates: if x people walk or cycle a distance of y on most days, what is the economic value of impacts on premature mortality, taking into account effects of physical activity, air pollution and road fatalities, as well as effects on carbon emissions. Different data sources were collated to examine how the HEAT in more than 10 years of existence, and to identify lessons learned and challenges. Results: Since its launch in 2009, the HEAT has gained wide recognition as a user friendly, yet robust, evidence-based tool usable by academics, policymakers, and practitioners. Originally designed for use in Europe, it has since been expanded for global use. Discussion: Challenges for a wider uptake of health-impact assessment (HIA) tools including active transport such as HEAT are the promotion and dissemination to local practitioners and policy makers also outside European and English-speaking regions and in low- and middle-income contexts, further increasing usability, and more generally the advancement of systematic data collection and impact quantification related to walking and cycling.

Indexed as

cyclingeconomic assessmenthealth impact assessmentwalking, policy

Identifiers

PMID37389275
PMCPMC10305804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.