Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389187›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023

Impact of Cuproptosis-related markers on clinical status, tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: A multi-omic analysis.

Yanfei Shao, Xiaodong Fan, Xiao Yang, Shuchun Li, Ling Huang, Xueliang Zhou, Sen Zhang, Minhua Zheng, Jing Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mechanisms of cuproptosis and its relevance to distinct diseases.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanfei ShaoDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong FanDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiao YangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuchun LiDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ling HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xueliang ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sen ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Minhua ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing SunDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cuproptosis, a novel identified cell death form induced by copper, is characterized by aggregation of lipoylated mitochondrial enzymes and the destabilization of Fe-S cluster proteins. However, the function and potential clinical value of cuproptosis and cuproptosis-related biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain largely unknown. Methods: A comprehensive multi-omics (transcriptomics, genomics, and single-cell transcriptome) analysis was performed for identifying the influence of 16 cuproptosis-related markers on clinical status, molecular functions and tumor microenvironment (TME) in CRC. A novel cuproptosis-related scoring system (CuproScore) based on cuproptosis-related markers was also constructed to predict the prognosis of CRC individuals, TME and the response to immunotherapy. In addition, our transcriptome cohort of 15 paired CRC tissue, tissue-array, and various assays in 4 kinds of CRC cell lines in vitro were applied for verification. Results: Cuproptosis-related markers were closely associated with both clinical prognosis and molecular functions. And the cuproptosis-related molecular phenotypes and scoring system (CuproScore) could distinguish and predict the prognosis of CRC patients, TME, and the response to immunotherapy in both public and our transcriptome cohorts. Besides, the expression, function and clinical significance of these markers were also checked and analyzed in CRC cell lines and CRC tissues in our own cohorts. Conclusions: In conclusion, we indicated that cuproptosis and CPRMs played a significant role in CRC progression and in modeling the TME. Inducing cuproptosis may be a useful tool for tumor therapy in the future.

Indexed as

Colorectal CancerCuproptosisCuproScoreImmunotherapyMolecular Phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID37389187
PMCPMC10300104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.