ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2023
Approaches to Sampling for Quality Control of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Research.
Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of dual-energy CT radiomics in evaluating vascular maturity and prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Approach to a preparation of dataset combining digital mammographic images and patient clinical data from electronic medical records.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Evolution of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Application for Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Independent evaluation of the accuracy of 5 artificial intelligence software for detecting lung nodules on chest X-rays.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Experience of Using Neural Networks to Assess Age-Related Changes in Some Structures of the Skull and Cervical Vertebrae Based on CT Scans (Pilot Project).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials and Methods: The approaches to sampling based on point statistical estimation, statistical hypothesis testing, employing ready-made statistical tables, as well as options of the approaches presented in GOST R ISO 2859-1-2007 "Statistical methods. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes" have been analyzed. We have considered variants of sampling of different sizes for general populations from 1000 to 100,000 studies.The analysis of the approaches to sampling was carried out as part of an experiment on the use of innovative technologies in computer vision for the analysis of medical images and their further application in the healthcare system of Moscow (Russia). Results: Ready-made tables have specific statistical input data, which does not make them a universal option for biomedical research. Point statistical estimation helps to calculate a sample based on given statistical parameters with a certain confidence interval. This approach is promising in the case when only a type I error is important for the researcher, and a type II error is not a priority. Using the approach based on statistical hypothesis testing makes it possible to take account of type I and II errors based on the given statistical parameters. The application of GOST R ISO 2859-1-2007 for sampling allows using ready-made values depending on the given statistical parameters.When evaluating the efficacy of the studied approaches, it was found that for our purposes, the optimal number of studies during AI quality control for the analysis of medical images is 80 items. This meets the requirements of representativeness, balance of the risks to the consumer and the AI service provider, as well as optimization of labor costs of employees involved in the process of quality control of the AI results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.