ReviewSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2023
Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Microsurgical Operating Room (Review).
Review in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vision-Capable LLMs in Microsurgery: A Blinded Comparison of Two AI Models with Expert Microsurgeons in the Appraisal of 200 Experimental Anastomoses.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of basic life support practice skills based on artificial intelligence technology: system construction and evaluation equivalence validation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery training within plastic surgery: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based perioperative safety verification system improved the performance of surgical safety verification execution.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgery performed by a novice neurosurgeon under constant supervision of a senior surgeon with the experience of thousands of operations, able to handle any intraoperative complications and predict them in advance, and never getting tired, is currently an elusive dream, but can become a reality with the development of artificial intelligence methods. This paper has presented a review of the literature on the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the microsurgical operating room. Searching for sources was carried out in the PubMed text database of medical and biological publications. The key words used were "surgical procedures", "dexterity", "microsurgery" AND "artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" OR "neural networks". Articles in English and Russian were considered with no limitation to publication date. The main directions of research on the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the microsurgical operating room have been highlighted. Despite the fact that in recent years machine learning has been increasingly introduced into the medical field, a small number of studies related to the problem of interest have been published, and their results have not proved to be of practical use yet. However, the social significance of this direction is an important argument for its development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.