Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37389004›Full record

ReviewBJR open2023

CT and MRI of head and neck cutaneous lesions.

Jason Gan, Romman Nourzaie, Brent J Doolan, Steve Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason GanGuys and St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-3758
Romman NourzaieGuys and St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Brent J DoolanGuys and St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Steve Connor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous lesions are derived from the epidermis, dermis and cutaneous appendages. Whilst imaging may occasionally be performed to evaluate such lesions, they may be undiagnosed and demonstrated for the first time on head and neck imaging studies. Although usually amenable to clinical examination and biopsy, CT or MRI studies may also demonstrate characteristic imaging features which aid the radiological differential diagnosis. In addition, imaging studies define the extent and staging of malignant lesions, as well as the complications of benign lesions. It is important for the radiologist to understanding the clinical significance and associations of these cutaneous conditions. This pictorial review will describe and depict the imaging appearances of benign, malignant, overgrowth, blistering, appendage and syndromic cutaneous lesions. An increasing awareness of the imaging characteristics of cutaneous lesions and related conditions will help the framing of a clinically relevant report.

Identifiers

PMID37389004
PMCPMC10301713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.