ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023
LSnet: detecting and genotyping deletions using deep learning network.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CGLoop: a neural network framework for chromatin loop prediction.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- deepTAD: an approach for identifying topologically associated domains based on convolutional neural network and transformer model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role and biological impact of structural variation (SV) are increasingly evident. Deletion accounts for 40% of SV and is an important type of SV. Therefore, it is of great significance to detect and genotype deletions. At present, high accurate long reads can be obtained as HiFi reads. And, through a combination of error-prone long reads and high accurate short reads, we can also get accurate long reads. These accurate long reads are helpful for detecting and genotyping SVs. However, due to the complexity of genome and alignment information, detecting and genotyping SVs remain a challenging task. Here, we propose LSnet, an approach for detecting and genotyping deletions with a deep learning network. Because of the ability of deep learning to learn complex features in labeled datasets, it is beneficial for detecting SV. First, LSnet divides the reference genome into continuous sub-regions. Based on the alignment between the sequencing data (the combination of error-prone long reads and short reads or HiFi reads) and the reference genome, LSnet extracts nine features for each sub-region, and these features are considered as signal of deletion. Second, LSnet uses a convolutional neural network and an attention mechanism to learn critical features in every sub-region. Next, in accordance with the relationship among the continuous sub-regions, LSnet uses a gated recurrent units (GRU) network to further extract more important deletion signatures. And a heuristic algorithm is present to determine the location and length of deletions. Experimental results show that LSnet outperforms other methods in terms of the F1 score. The source code is available from GitHub at https://github.com/eioyuou/LSnet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.