Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

LSnet: detecting and genotyping deletions using deep learning network.

Junwei Luo, Runtian Gao, Wenjing Chang, Junfeng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junwei LuoSchool of Software, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.
Runtian GaoSchool of Software, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.
Wenjing ChangSchool of Software, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.
Junfeng WangSchool of Software, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role and biological impact of structural variation (SV) are increasingly evident. Deletion accounts for 40% of SV and is an important type of SV. Therefore, it is of great significance to detect and genotype deletions. At present, high accurate long reads can be obtained as HiFi reads. And, through a combination of error-prone long reads and high accurate short reads, we can also get accurate long reads. These accurate long reads are helpful for detecting and genotyping SVs. However, due to the complexity of genome and alignment information, detecting and genotyping SVs remain a challenging task. Here, we propose LSnet, an approach for detecting and genotyping deletions with a deep learning network. Because of the ability of deep learning to learn complex features in labeled datasets, it is beneficial for detecting SV. First, LSnet divides the reference genome into continuous sub-regions. Based on the alignment between the sequencing data (the combination of error-prone long reads and short reads or HiFi reads) and the reference genome, LSnet extracts nine features for each sub-region, and these features are considered as signal of deletion. Second, LSnet uses a convolutional neural network and an attention mechanism to learn critical features in every sub-region. Next, in accordance with the relationship among the continuous sub-regions, LSnet uses a gated recurrent units (GRU) network to further extract more important deletion signatures. And a heuristic algorithm is present to determine the location and length of deletions. Experimental results show that LSnet outperforms other methods in terms of the F1 score. The source code is available from GitHub at https://github.com/eioyuou/LSnet.

Indexed as

attention mechanismconvolutional neural networkdeletiongated recurrent units networkstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID37388936
PMCPMC10301831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.