Experience of lanadelumab administration in hereditary angioedema: A case series of 4 patients in Portugal.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sustained Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Long-Term Prophylaxis with Lanadelumab in Hereditary Angioedema: The Prospective, Phase 4, Noninterventional EMPOWER Real-World Study.Advances in therapy · 2025
   Trial
2. Lanadelumab Use for Hereditary Angioedema Long-Term Prophylaxis Over the Last 7 Years: A Narrative Review of Clinical and Real-World Data.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026
   Review
3. Delphi Consensus on Attenuated Androgen Use for Long-Term Prophylaxis in Hereditary Angioedema: AURA Project.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.