Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388757›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2023

SNAP: a structure-based neuron morphology reconstruction automatic pruning pipeline.

Liya Ding, Xuan Zhao, Shuxia Guo, Yufeng Liu, Lijuan Liu, Yimin Wang, Hanchuan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liya DingInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xuan ZhaoInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Shuxia GuoInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yufeng LiuInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Lijuan LiuInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yimin WangInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Hanchuan PengInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neuron morphology analysis is an essential component of neuron cell-type definition. Morphology reconstruction represents a bottleneck in high-throughput morphology analysis workflow, and erroneous extra reconstruction owing to noise and entanglements in dense neuron regions restricts the usability of automated reconstruction results. We propose SNAP, a structure-based neuron morphology reconstruction pruning pipeline, to improve the usability of results by reducing erroneous extra reconstruction and splitting entangled neurons. Methods: For the four different types of erroneous extra segments in reconstruction (caused by noise in the background, entanglement with dendrites of close-by neurons, entanglement with axons of other neurons, and entanglement within the same neuron), SNAP incorporates specific statistical structure information into rules for erroneous extra segment detection and achieves pruning and multiple dendrite splitting. Results: Experimental results show that this pipeline accomplishes pruning with satisfactory precision and recall. It also demonstrates good multiple neuron-splitting performance. As an effective tool for post-processing reconstruction, SNAP can facilitate neuron morphology analysis.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsdendrite tracingimage processingneuron morphology reconstructionpost-processing

Identifiers

PMID37388757
PMCPMC10303825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.