ArticleJACS Au2023
Markov State Models Reconcile Conformational Plasticity of GTPase with Its Substrate Binding Event.
Article in JACS Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the conformational dynamics of PI3Kα due to helical domain mutations: insights from Markov state model analysis.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Conformational Dynamics of the Histone Tails Using Markov State Modeling.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Deciphering allosteric mechanisms in KRAS activation: insights from GTP-induced conformational dynamics and interaction network reorganization.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Incorporating Prior Knowledge in the Seeds of Adaptive Sampling Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ligand Transport in Enzymes with Buried Active Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ras GTPase is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and plays an important role in controlling crucial cellular signaling pathways. However, this enzyme has always been believed to be undruggable due to its strong binding affinity with its native substrate GTP. To understand the potential origin of high GTPase/GTP recognition, here we reconstruct the complete process of GTP binding to Ras GTPase via building Markov state models (MSMs) using a 0.1 ms long all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The kinetic network model, derived from the MSM, identifies multiple pathways of GTP en route to its binding pocket. While the substrate stalls onto a set of non-native metastable GTPase/GTP encounter complexes, the MSM accurately discovers the native pose of GTP at its designated catalytic site in crystallographic precision. However, the series of events exhibit signatures of conformational plasticity in which the protein remains trapped in multiple non-native conformations even when GTP has already located itself in its native binding site. The investigation demonstrates mechanistic relays pertaining to simultaneous fluctuations of switch 1 and switch 2 residues which remain most instrumental in maneuvering the GTP-binding process. Scanning of the crystallographic database reveals close resemblance between observed non-native GTP binding poses and precedent crystal structures of substrate-bound GTPase, suggesting potential roles of these binding-competent intermediates in allosteric regulation of the recognition process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.