ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2023
A fresh look at propriospinal interneurons plasticity and intraspinal circuits remodeling after spinal cord injury.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The equilibrium point hypothesis revisited: why threshold control does not explain human movement.Experimental brain research · 2026Review
- Current status and future prospects of brain-computer interfaces in the field of neurological disease rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Injury 2.0: Bridging the Gap Between Neurobiology, Technology, and Hope in the Era of Precision Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- Activated alpha 9 integrin expression enables sensory pathway reconstruction after spinal cord injury.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Review
- Progress in spinal cord organoid research: advancing understanding of neural development, disease modelling, and regenerative medicine.Biomaterials translational · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts communication between the brain-derived descending commands and the intraspinal circuits, the central pattern generator (CPG), that execute movements. Dynamic changes in the interaction of the brain-spinal cord as well as in structure-function relationships play a vital role in the determination of neurological function restoration. These changes also have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with SCI. After SCI, at both brain and spinal cord levels, detour circuits formation and neuronal plasticity have been linked to functional improvement under the condition of spontaneous recovery as well as electrical stimulation- and rehabilitative training-assisted recovery. The principles governing neural circuit remodeling and the neuronal subtypes specifically involved during the recovery from SCI are largely unknown. In the present review, we focus on how multi-level neural circuits are reconstructed after SCI. We highlight some new studies using rodent and zebrafish SCI models that describe how the intraspinal detour circuits are reconstructed and the important roles of spinal excitatory interneurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.