Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388436›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023

Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in the management of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mukta Motwani, Aditi Fadnavis, Apeksha Dhole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Trigeminal neuralgia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mukta MotwaniDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Vidya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Dental College & Research Center (VSPM DCRC), Nagpur, India.
Aditi FadnavisPG student Department of Oral medicine and Radiology , VSPM dental college and Research Centre, Nagpur, India.
Apeksha DholeV.S.P.M. Dental College and Research Center, Nagpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Trigeminal Neuralgia is one of the most painful disorders known to man. So making patient pain free and to achieve a better quality of life in TN patients is one of the biggest challenge. Non-invasive procedures like Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) have been tried clinically for Trigeminal neuralgia. Aim: The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the management of trigeminal neuralgia. The present review has been registered with PROSPERO - An international prospective register of systematic review CRD42021254136. Material and Methods: An electronic search was done in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar, EBSCOHOST. The assessments of articles were done using selection criteria and PRISMA guidelines Only prospective clinical trials like Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and clinical trials were included in this review. A total of three studies were included in the meta -analysis. Results: The proportion of total number of patients after TENS therapy across studies with p-value < 0.0001 for each which showed statistically significance. The overall difference in two groups was significant with standardize mean difference of 3.03 [95% CI: 2.50, 3.56]. Conclusions: TENS can be an effective treatment modality for trigeminal neuralgia in reducing the pain intensity with no reported side effects for patients with trigeminal neuralgia alone or even in combination with other first line drugs.

Identifiers

PMID37388436
PMCPMC10306390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.