ArticleSSM. Mental health2023
Cycles of reform in the history of psychosis treatment in the United States.
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a hybrid asynchronous-synchronous delivery model for family intervention in psychosis: the psychosis REACH program.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Why deinstitutionalisation still matters: Reclaiming a contested horizon in global mental health.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Stakeholders' perceptions of recovery from psychosis in Blantyre, Malawi: Definitions, goals, and interventions.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Measuring emotions: schizophrenia and family across cultural boundaries.Medical history · 2026Article
- A Critical Overview of Mental Health Policies for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Chile.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Article
- Utica State Hospital: Psychiatric Reform, Institutionalization, and Patient Justice in 19th Century America and Today.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the Need for Psychiatry Sub-Specialization in Nepal: A Cross-sectional Survey Among Psychiatrists.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
- Screening for Early Emerging Mental Experiences: Feasibility of Psychosis Screening in Integrated Care Settings.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- "I don't think I have been out of fight or flight. Ever." Transgender people's experiences in inpatient psychiatric treatment.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Failure to treat: an American policy perspective.CNS spectrums · 2024Review
- Impact of stigma on the placement of mental health facilities: insights from early career psychiatrists worldwide.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The history of psychosis treatment follows a series of four cycles of reform which provide a framework for understanding mental health services in the United States. The first three cycles of reform promoted the view that early treatment of mental disorders would reduce chronic impairment and disability. The Moral Treatment era (early 1800's to 1890) featured freestanding asylums, the Mental Hygiene movement (1890 to World War II) introduced psychiatric hospitals and clinics, and the Community Mental Health Reform period (World War II to late 1970's) produced community mental health centers. None of these approaches succeeded in achieving the disability-prevention goals of early treatment of psychosis. The fourth cycle, the Community Support Reform era (late 1970's to the present) shifted the focus to caring for those already disabled by a mental disorder within their communities and using natural support systems. This shift embraced a broader social welfare framework and included additional services and supports, such as housing, case management, and education. Psychosis became more central during the current Community Support Reform era partly because individuals with psychosis continued to have disabling life experiences despite efforts at reform. Some degree of recovery from psychosis is possible, and individuals with serious impairment may move towards social integration and community participation. Early intervention for young people with psychosis focuses on reducing the negative sequelae of psychosis and promotes recovery-oriented changes in service delivery. The role of social control, the involvement of service users and their families, and the balance between psychosocial and biomedical treatments play an important role in this history. This paper describes the reform cycles, their political and policy contexts, and what influenced its successes and shortcomings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.