Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388405›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2023

Cycles of reform in the history of psychosis treatment in the United States.

Preethy George, Nev Jones, Howard Goldman, Abram Rosenblatt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Preethy GeorgeWestat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States.
Nev JonesUniversity of Pittsburgh, School of Social Work, 2314 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, United States.
Howard GoldmanUniversity of Maryland, School of Medicine, 3700 Koppers Street, Baltimore, MD, 21227, Suite 402, United States.
Abram RosenblattWestat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States.
Westat (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET): Data Coordinating CenterU24MH120591 · NIMH · WESTAT, INC. · PI ROSENBLATT, ABRAM · 2019 to 2023
$10.0M
NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH120591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The history of psychosis treatment follows a series of four cycles of reform which provide a framework for understanding mental health services in the United States. The first three cycles of reform promoted the view that early treatment of mental disorders would reduce chronic impairment and disability. The Moral Treatment era (early 1800's to 1890) featured freestanding asylums, the Mental Hygiene movement (1890 to World War II) introduced psychiatric hospitals and clinics, and the Community Mental Health Reform period (World War II to late 1970's) produced community mental health centers. None of these approaches succeeded in achieving the disability-prevention goals of early treatment of psychosis. The fourth cycle, the Community Support Reform era (late 1970's to the present) shifted the focus to caring for those already disabled by a mental disorder within their communities and using natural support systems. This shift embraced a broader social welfare framework and included additional services and supports, such as housing, case management, and education. Psychosis became more central during the current Community Support Reform era partly because individuals with psychosis continued to have disabling life experiences despite efforts at reform. Some degree of recovery from psychosis is possible, and individuals with serious impairment may move towards social integration and community participation. Early intervention for young people with psychosis focuses on reducing the negative sequelae of psychosis and promotes recovery-oriented changes in service delivery. The role of social control, the involvement of service users and their families, and the balance between psychosocial and biomedical treatments play an important role in this history. This paper describes the reform cycles, their political and policy contexts, and what influenced its successes and shortcomings.

Indexed as

Mental health policyMental health services historyPsychosisSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID37388405
PMCPMC10302760
OpenAlexW4353094445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.