Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388318›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Exploring subcolony differences in foraging and reproductive success: the influence of environmental conditions on a central place foraging seabird.

Jessica Pulvirenti, Richard D Reina, Andre Chiaradia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica PulvirentiSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-570X
Richard D ReinaSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6221-1300
Andre ChiaradiaSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-4211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While differences in foraging and reproductive success are well studied between seabird colonies, they are less understood at a smaller subcolony scale. Working with little penguins (

Indexed as

Eudyptula minorforaging successreproductive successseabird subcoloniessea surface temperaturesegregation

Identifiers

PMID37388318
PMCPMC10300673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.