Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388306›Full record

ArticleDental research journal2023

Evaluation of stress and deformation in bone with titanium, CFR-PEEK and zirconia ceramic implants by finite element analysis.

G Mahalakshmi, Anjaneyulu Gasthi, H M Hosain Almansour, P Babaji, U Madhusudhana Rao, S A Haseeb, V Venkata Ramaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental research journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G MahalakshmiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anjaneyulu GasthiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
H M Hosain AlmansourDepartment of Dental Implant, MOH, Najran Dental Specialist Center, Najran, India.
P BabajiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Sharavathi Dental College, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
U Madhusudhana RaoDepartment of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India.
S A HaseebDepartment of Prosthodontics, Sharavathi Dental College and Hospital, Shivamoga, Karnataka, India.
V Venkata RamaiahDepartment of Dental Hygienic, College of Applied Health Sciences in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As more recent implant biomaterials, Zirconia ceramic and glass or carbon fibre reinforced PEEK composites have been introduced. In this study, bone stress and deformation caused by titanium, carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFRPEEK), and zirconia ceramic implants were compared. Materials and Methods: In this Results: With no discernible differences, all three implant assemblies that is CFR-PEEK, titanium, and zirconia demonstrated similar stresses and deformation in bone. Conclusion: It was determined that zirconia and PEEK and reinforced with carban fibres (CFR-PEEK) can be used as titanium-free implant biomaterial substitutes.

Indexed as

CFR-PEEKFinite element analysisimplantstress distributiontitaniumzirconia

Identifiers

PMID37388306
PMCPMC10300267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.