Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388280›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Fusion of imaging and non-imaging data for disease trajectory prediction for coronavirus disease 2019 patients.

Amara Tariq, Siyi Tang, Hifza Sakhi, Leo Anthony Celi, Janice M Newsome, Daniel L Rubin, Hari Trivedi, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Imon Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amara TariqMayo Clinic, Department of Administration, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Siyi TangStanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, California, United States.
Hifza SakhiPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine - Georgia Campus, Swanee, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7184-3265
Leo Anthony CeliMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Janice M NewsomeEmory University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Daniel L RubinStanford University, Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-4369
Hari TrivediEmory University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-8334
Judy Wawira GichoyaEmory University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-316X
Imon BanerjeeMayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-8004

Funding

RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
Flexible NLP toolkit for automatic curation of outcomes for breast cancer patientsU01CA269264 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Theresa H M Keegan · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Critical Care InformaticsR56EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, GHASSEMI, MARZYEH · 2018 to 2023
$783k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA269264NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00008NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92020C00021NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our study investigates whether graph-based fusion of imaging data with non-imaging electronic health records (EHR) data can improve the prediction of the disease trajectories for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) beyond the prediction performance of only imaging or non-imaging EHR data. Approach: We present a fusion framework for fine-grained clinical outcome prediction [discharge, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death] that fuses imaging and non-imaging information using a similarity-based graph structure. Node features are represented by image embedding, and edges are encoded with clinical or demographic similarity. Results: Experiments on data collected from the Emory Healthcare Network indicate that our fusion modeling scheme performs consistently better than predictive models developed using only imaging or non-imaging features, with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.76, 0.90, and 0.75 for discharge from hospital, mortality, and ICU admission, respectively. External validation was performed on data collected from the Mayo Clinic. Our scheme highlights known biases in the model prediction, such as bias against patients with alcohol abuse history and bias based on insurance status. Conclusions: Our study signifies the importance of the fusion of multiple data modalities for the accurate prediction of clinical trajectories. The proposed graph structure can model relationships between patients based on non-imaging EHR data, and graph convolutional networks can fuse this relationship information with imaging data to effectively predict future disease trajectory more effectively than models employing only imaging or non-imaging data. Our graph-based fusion modeling frameworks can be easily extended to other prediction tasks to efficiently combine imaging data with non-imaging clinical data.

Indexed as

clinical event predictionfusion modelgraph neural network

Identifiers

PMID37388280
PMCPMC10306115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.