Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

A phase II randomized clinical trial to assess toxicity and quality of life of breast cancer patients with hypofractionated versus conventional fractionation radiotherapy with regional nodal irradiation in the context of COVID-19 crisis.

Gabriel Oliveira Bernardes Gil, Warne Pedro de Andrade, Paulo Henrique Costa Diniz, Farley Soares Cantidio, Izabella Nobre Queiroz, Maria Luísa Braga Vieira Gil, Conceição Aparecida Medeiros Almeida, Paola Palmer Reis Caldeira, Marcos Regalin, Agnaldo Lopes Silva-Filho

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT40155531, which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT40155531 no registry record found
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel Oliveira Bernardes GilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rede Mater Dei and Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Warne Pedro de AndradeGynecology Department, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique Costa DinizDepartment of Oncology, Rede Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Farley Soares CantidioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rede Mater Dei and Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Izabella Nobre QueirozDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Luísa Braga Vieira GilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rede Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Conceição Aparecida Medeiros AlmeidaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paola Palmer Reis CaldeiraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcos RegalinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rede Mater Dei and Hospital da Baleia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Agnaldo Lopes Silva-FilhoGynecology Department, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho", Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study, conducted during the COVID-19 crisis, primarily aimed to compare the acute toxicity between conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CF-RT) with hypofractionated radiation therapy (HF-RT) among patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy in whom breast or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) were indicated. The secondary endpoints were both acute and subacute toxicity, cosmesis, quality of life, and lymphedema features. Methods: In this open and non-inferiority randomized trial, patients (n = 86) were randomly allocated 2:1 in the CF-RT arm (n = 33; 50 Gy/25 fractions ± sequential boost [10 Gy/5 fractions]) versus the HF-RT arm (n = 53; 40 Gy/15 fractions ± concomitant boost [8 Gy/15 fractions]). Toxic effects and cosmesis evaluation used the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 (CTCAE) and the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. For the patient-reported quality of life (QoL), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer-specific supplementary questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) were used. Lymphedema was assessed by comparing volume differences between the affected and contralateral arms using the Casley-Smith formula. Results: Grade 2 and grade 3 dermatitis were lower with HF-RT than with CF-RT (28% Conclusion: HF-RT was non-inferior to CF-RT, and moderate hypofractionation showed lower rates of acute toxicity, with no changes in quality-of-life outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT40155531.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast cancer lymphedemaquality of liferadiation dose hypofractionationtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID37388233
PMCPMC10301738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.