Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37388194›Full record

ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2023

Social determinants of health and disease in companion dogs: a cohort study from the Dog Aging Project.

Brianah M McCoy, Layla Brassington, Kelly Jin, Greer A Dolby, Sandi Shrager, Devin Collins, Matthew Dunbar, Dog Aging Project Consortium, Audrey Ruple, Noah Snyder-Mackler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brianah M McCoySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1988-3248
Layla BrassingtonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9091-7714
Kelly JinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-6461
Greer A DolbyDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, ALUSA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-0690
Sandi ShragerCollaborative Health Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Devin CollinsDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5959-9455
Matthew DunbarCenter for Studies in Demography & Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9145-7043
Dog Aging Project Consortium
Audrey RupleDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-0217
Noah Snyder-MacklerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-6160

Funding

The Dog Aging Project: Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Healthy Aging in Companion Dogs Competitive RevisionU19AG057377 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KEENE, CHRISTOPHER DIRK, PROMISLOW, DANIEL EDWARD · 2018 to 2023
$29.0M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to social environmental adversity is associated with health and survival across many social species, including humans. However, little is known about how these health and mortality effects vary across the lifespan and may be differentially impacted by various components of the environment. Here, we leveraged a relatively new and powerful model for human aging, the companion dog, to investigate which components of the social environment are associated with dog health and how these associations vary across the lifespan. We drew on comprehensive survey data collected on 21,410 dogs from the Dog Aging Project and identified five factors that together explained 33.7% of the variation in a dog's social environment. Factors capturing financial and household adversity were associated with poorer health and lower physical mobility in companion dogs, while factors that captured social support, such as living with other dogs, were associated with better health when controlling for dog age and weight. Notably, the effects of each environmental component were not equal: the effect of social support was 5× stronger than financial factors. The strength of these associations depended on the age of the dog, including a stronger relationship between the owner's age and the dog's health in younger as compared to older dogs. Taken together, these findings suggest the importance of income, stability and owner's age on owner-reported health outcomes in companion dogs and point to potential behavioral and/or environmental modifiers that can be used to promote healthy aging across species.

Indexed as

agingcompanion dogshealth and diseasesocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID37388194
PMCPMC10306367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.