Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37387788›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

A panel of seven protein tumour markers for effective and affordable multi-cancer early detection by artificial intelligence: a large-scale and multicentre case-control study.

Yi Luan, Guolin Zhong, Shiyong Li, Wei Wu, Xiaoqiang Liu, Dandan Zhu, Yumin Feng, Yixia Zhang, Chaohui Duan, Mao Mao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06342440 (A Liquid Biopsy Assay For The Non-Invasive Early Detection of Advanced Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06342440 recruitingnot on this map

A Liquid Biopsy Assay For The Non-Invasive Early Detection of Advanced Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2020 to 2028Enrolled2,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal AdenocarcinomaArmsDENEB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yi LuanClinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guolin ZhongResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Shiyong LiResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Wei WuResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Xiaoqiang LiuClinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Dandan ZhuClinical Laboratories, Shenyou Bio, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Yumin FengResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yixia ZhangResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Chaohui DuanClinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Mao MaoResearch & Development, SeekIn Inc, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection of cancer aims to reduce cancer deaths. Unfortunately, many established cancer screening technologies are not suitable for use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to cost, complexity, and dependency on extensive medical infrastructure. We aimed to assess the performance and robustness of a protein assay (OncoSeek) for multi-cancer early detection (MCED) that is likely to be more practical in LMICs. Methods: This observational study comprises a retrospective analysis on the data generated from the routine clinical testings at SeekIn and Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. 7565 participants (954 with cancer and 6611 without) from the two sites were divided into training and independent validation cohort. The second validation cohort (1005 with cancer and 812 without) was from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Patients with cancer prior to therapy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Individuals with no history of cancer were enrolled from the participating sites as the non-cancer group. One tube of peripheral blood was collected from each participant and quantified a panel of seven selected protein tumour markers (PTMs) by a common clinical electrochemiluminescence immunoassay analyser. An algorithm named OncoSeek was established using artificial intelligence (AI) to distinguish patients with cancer from those without cancer by calculating the probability of cancer (POC) index based on the quantification results of the seven PTMs and clinical information including sex and age of the individuals and to predict the possible affected tissue of origin (TOO) for those who have been detected with cancer signals in blood. Findings: Between November 2012 and May 2022, 7565 participants were enrolled at SeekIn and Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The conventional clinical method, which relies only on a single threshold for each PTM, would suffer from a high false positive rate that accumulates as the number of markers increased. OncoSeek was empowered by AI technology to significantly reduce the false positive rate, increasing the specificity from 56.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.8-58.0) to 92.9% (92.3-93.5). In all cancer types, the overall sensitivity of OncoSeek was 51.7% (49.4-53.9), resulting in 84.3% (83.5-85.0) accuracy. The performance was generally consistent in the training and the two validation cohorts. The sensitivities ranged from 37.1% to 77.6% for the detection of the nine common cancer types (breast, colorectum, liver, lung, lymphoma, oesophagus, ovary, pancreas, and stomach), which account for ∼59.2% of global cancer deaths annually. Furthermore, it has shown excellent sensitivity in several high-mortality cancer types for which routine screening tests are lacking in the clinic, such as the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer which was 77.6% (69.3-84.6). The overall accuracy of TOO prediction in the true positives was 66.8%, which could assist the clinical diagnostic workup. Interpretation: OncoSeek significantly outperforms the conventional clinical method, representing a novel blood-based test for MCED which is non-invasive, easy, efficient, and robust. Moreover, the accuracy of TOO facilitates the follow-up diagnostic workup. Funding: The National Key Research and Development Programme of China.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Liquid biopsyLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs)Multi-cancer early detection (MCED)Protein tumour markers (PTMs)

Identifiers

PMID37387788
PMCPMC10300313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.