ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023
Association between social isolation and subjective cognitive decline in Korean older adult population: A nationwide cross-sectional study in South Korea.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Generative AI Framework for Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults: An Integrated Engineering Design and Clinical Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular risk in seasonal migrant workers in Southern Italy: clinical-epidemiological evaluation.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Exploring Factors Related to Social Isolation Among Older Adults in the Predementia Stage Using Ecological Momentary Assessments and Actigraphy: Machine Learning Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The relationship between social networks and subjective cognitive decline in Chinese younger older adults: the mediating effect of self-perception of aging.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Subjective cognitive decline-a neglected but preventable public health concern: development and validation of a risk prediction model for subjective cognitive decline in older adults: a cross-sectional survey study from Anhui Province in eastern China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the association between social isolation (SI) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in Koreans aged 65 years or older. The cross-sectional study of the Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS) was conducted on 72,904 individuals aged 65 years or older. SI was defined using five indicator, and an increasing number of SI indicators signifies a higher level of SI. SCD was defined as self-observed impairment of more frequent or worsening memory loss or confusion within the previous 12 months. The cognitive function questionnaire included questions regarding SCD. Chi-square test and weighted logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the association between SI and SCD. SI group had higher odds of SCD experience rate than the non-SI (AOR:1.15, 95 % CI: 1.08-1.22). Subgroup analysis showed that when SI occurred in the non-Moderate or Vigorous Physical Exercise (MVPE) group, SI group was more likely to experience SCD compared with the non-SI (AOR: 1.17, 95 % CI: 1.10-1.25). However, when SI occurred in the MVPE group, there were not find out the association between SI and SCD. The results of this study showed that the SI group had a higher rate of SCD than the non-SI group. Particularly, a strong association was observed in the non-MVPE. Therefore, even if SI occurs, SCD can be prevented by educating individuals regarding the importance of participating in MVPE and depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.