Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37387492›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2023

Comparison of Four T-cell Assays and Two Binding Antibody Assays in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinees With or Without Omicron Breakthrough Infection.

Yeon Ju Seo, Inseong Oh, Minjeong Nam, Sue Shin, Eun Youn Roh, Eun Young Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance of the Roche Elecsys® IGRA SARS-CoV-2 test for the detection and quantification of virus-reactive T cells in COVID-19-vaccinated immunosuppressed patients and healthy subjects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yeon Ju SeoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9130-7961
Inseong OhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-1000
Minjeong NamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3542-3487
Sue ShinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-8671
Eun Youn RohDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1787-7509
Eun Young SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1286-9611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several T-cell response assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are available; however, their comparability and correlations with antibody responses remain unclear. We compared four SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response assays and two anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assays. Methods: We enrolled 89 participants who had received a booster dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccine. Fifty-six participants without breakthrough infection (BI) (ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 group: N=27; BNT162b2 group: N=29) and 33 with BI were included. We evaluated two whole-blood interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) (QuantiFERON and Euroimmun), T-SPOT.COVID, an in-house enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay (targeting the spike and nucleocapsid peptides of wild-type and Omicron SARS-CoV-2), Abbott IgG II Quant, and Elecsys Anti-S, using Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Spearman's correlation tests. Results: The correlations between the IGRAs and between the ELISPOT assays (ρ=0.60-0.70) were stronger than those between the IGRAs and ELISPOT assays (ρ=0.33-0.57). T-SPOT.COVID showed a strong correlation with Omicron ELISPOT (ρ=0.70). The anti-spike antibody assays showed moderate correlations with T-SPOT.COVID, Euroimmun IGRA, and ELISPOT (ρ=0.43-0.62). Correlations tended to be higher in the BI than in the noninfected group, indicating that infection induces a stronger immune response. Conclusions: T-cell response assays show moderate to strong correlations, particularly when using the same platform. T-SPOT.COVID exhibits potential for estimating immune responses to the Omicron variant. To accurately define SARS-CoV-2 immune status, both T-cell and B-cell response measurements are necessary.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralBreakthrough InfectionsHumansSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCellular immunityEnzyme-linked immunospot assayHumoral immunityInterferon-gamma release testsOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37387492
PMCPMC10345181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.