ReviewPathologica2023
The slow-paced digital evolution of pathology: lights and shadows from a multifaceted board.
Review in Pathologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and opportunities of implementing open-source digital pathology in sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from deploying QuPath for breast cancer biomarker assessment in Cameroon.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Digitalization and Gamification to Improve Pathology Education: The SIAPeC Quiz Experience.Pathologica · 2026Article
- Precision Diagnosis in Cutaneous Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Seeing Beyond the Microscope: Artificial Intelligence and Fluorescence Confocal Digital Imaging in Pediatric Surgical Pathology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing the way students learn photographic arts through experiential education using AI and AR systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Digital slide scanning at scale: Comparison of whole slide imaging devices in a clinical setting.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- The routine use of a digital tool for the tumor cell fraction quantification in molecular pathology: an international validation of QuANTUM.Pathologica · 2025Article
- Improving the Annotation Process in Computational Pathology: A Pilot Study with Manual and Semi-automated Approaches on Consumer and Medical Grade Devices.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Perspectives on Reducing Barriers to the Adoption of Digital and Computational Pathology Technology by Clinical Labs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Digital counting of tissue cells for molecular analysis: the QuANTUM pipeline.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) in Pathology: Emerging Trends and Future Applications in Clinical Diagnostics, Medical Education, and Pathology.Iranian journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Eye tracking in digital pathology: A comprehensive literature review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- BAP1 Loss, Nuclear Grading, and Nonepithelioid Features in the Diagnosis of Mesothelioma in Italy: Nevermore without the Pathology Report.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Advances in radiology and pathology of prostate cancer: a review for the pathologist.Pathologica · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The digital revolution in pathology represents an invaluable resource fto optimise costs, reduce the risk of error and improve patient care, even though it is still adopted in a minority of laboratories. Barriers include concerns about initial costs, lack of confidence in using whole slide images for primary diagnosis, and lack of guidance on transition. To address these challenges and develop a programme to facilitate the introduction of digital pathology (DP) in Italian pathology departments, a panel discussion was set up to identify the key points to be considered. Methods: On 21 July 2022, an initial conference call was held on Zoom to identify the main issues to be discussed during the face-to-face meeting. The final summit was divided into four different sessions: (I) the definition of DP, (II) practical applications of DP, (III) the use of AI in DP, (IV) DP and education. Results: Essential requirements for the implementation of DP are a fully tracked and automated workflow, selection of the appropriate scanner based on the specific needs of each department, and a strong commitment combined with coordinated teamwork (pathologists, technicians, biologists, IT service and industries). This could reduce human error, leading to the application of AI tools for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction. Open challenges are the lack of specific regulations for virtual slide storage and the optimal storage solution for large volumes of slides. Conclusion: Teamwork is key to DP transition, including close collaboration with industry. This will ease the transition and help bridge the gap that currently exists between many labs and full digitisation. The ultimate goal is to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.