Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37387324›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Comparison of cystocentesis versus home sampling to determine urinary protein: Creatinine ratio and urine specific gravity in cats.

Femke Mortier, Sylvie Daminet, Luc Duchateau, Sofie J J Marynissen, Dominique Paepe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Femke MortierSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-2561
Sylvie DaminetSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6733-7925
Luc DuchateauBiometrics Research Center, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie J J MarynissenSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1884-9366
Dominique PaepeSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-1712
University College Ghent · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent BOF.STG.2019.0013.01CEVA Santé AnimaleIDEXX Laboratories Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinalysis is necessary for the diagnostic evaluation of chronic kidney disease in cats. Performing cystocentesis is not always feasible, but data comparing urine obtained by cystocentesis in the clinic with voided samples collected at home are lacking in cats.

objectivesTo compare urinary protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) and urine specific gravity (USG) and to detect clinically relevant changes in proteinuria substage or urine concentration between urine collected at home and in-clinic by cystocentesis in cats. ANIMALS: Ninety-two healthy and diseased client-owned cats.

methodsProspective study. Owners collected voided urine at home and within 1 to 15 hours, cystocentesis was performed in the clinic.

resultsIn a subset of motivated owners, 55% succeeded in collecting urine at home. Overall, UPC was higher (mean ±SD difference = 0.09 ±0.22; P < .001) and USG was lower (mean ±SD difference = -0.006 ±0.009; P < .001) in cystocentesis samples than in voided urine. Substantial agreement existed between sampling methods for UPC (weighted к = 0.68) and USG (к = 0.64) categories. A different proteinuria substage (UPC < 0.2, 0.2-0.4, >0.4) was present in paired urine samples from 28% of cats. In 18% of cats, urine concentrating ability (USG < or ≥1.035) differed between both samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Home sampling of urine is a valid alternative to cystocentesis in cats. However, because clinically relevant differences in UPC and USG were present in 28% and 18% of cats, respectively, by the same collection method for monitoring each cat is advised.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesUrinalysisAnimalsCatsCreatinineHumansProspective StudiesProteinuriaSpecific GravityCreatininefelinekidney diseaseproteinuriaurine collection methodvoided

Identifiers

PMID37387324
PMCPMC10365041
OpenAlexW4382632231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.