ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Reprohackathons: promoting reproducibility in bioinformatics through training.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- LORA: a polymorphic multi-sample long read assembly pipeline.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CholeraSeq: a comprehensive genomic pipeline for cholera surveillance and near real-time outbreak investigation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Mapping pathogen genomics training provision: a structured analysis within a global consortium network.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From ideal to practical: Heterogeneity of student-generated variant lists highlights hidden reproducibility gaps.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Galaxy as a gateway to bioinformatics: Multi-Interface Galaxy Hands-on Training Suite (MIGHTS) for scRNA-seq.GigaScience · 2025Article
- MHConstructor: a high-throughput, haplotype-informed solution to the MHC assembly challenge.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Auto-phylo v2 and auto-phylo-pipeliner: building advanced, flexible, and reusable pipelines for phylogenetic inferences, estimation of variability levels and identification of positively selected amino acid sites.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2024Article
- MHConstructor: A high-throughput, haplotype-informed solution to the MHC assembly challenge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe reproducibility crisis has highlighted the importance of improving the way bioinformatics data analyses are implemented, executed, and shared. To address this, various tools such as content versioning systems, workflow management systems, and software environment management systems have been developed. While these tools are becoming more widely used, there is still much work to be done to increase their adoption. The most effective way to ensure reproducibility becomes a standard part of most bioinformatics data analysis projects is to integrate it into the curriculum of bioinformatics Master's programs.
resultsIn this article, we present the Reprohackathon, a Master's course that we have been running for the last 3 years at Université Paris-Saclay (France), and that has been attended by a total of 123 students. The course is divided into two parts. The first part includes lessons on the challenges related to reproducibility, content versioning systems, container management, and workflow systems. In the second part, students work on a data analysis project for 3-4 months, reanalyzing data from a previously published study. The Reprohackaton has taught us many valuable lessons, such as the fact that implementing reproducible analyses is a complex and challenging task that requires significant effort. However, providing in-depth teaching of the concepts and the tools during a Master's degree program greatly improves students' understanding and abilities in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.