Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37387146›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing.

Timofey Prodanov, Vikas Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timofey ProdanovBioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-6651
Vikas BansalSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6684-5335

Funding

Refining Mendelian disease analysis via detection of clinically relevant repeat variantsR01HG010149 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna, Vikas Bansal · 2018 to 2026
$4.5M
Computational methods for variant calling and haplotyping using long-read sequencing technologiesR01HG010759 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BANSAL, VIKAS · 2020 to 2023
$1.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010149NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010759NIH HHS R01HG010149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationLow-copy repeats (LCRs) or segmental duplications are long segments of duplicated DNA that cover > 5% of the human genome. Existing tools for variant calling using short reads exhibit low accuracy in LCRs due to ambiguity in read mapping and extensive copy number variation. Variants in more than 150 genes overlapping LCRs are associated with risk for human diseases.

methodsWe describe a short-read variant calling method, ParascopyVC, that performs variant calling jointly across all repeat copies and utilizes reads independent of mapping quality in LCRs. To identify candidate variants, ParascopyVC aggregates reads mapped to different repeat copies and performs polyploid variant calling. Subsequently, paralogous sequence variants that can differentiate repeat copies are identified using population data and used for estimating the genotype of variants for each repeat copy.

resultsOn simulated whole-genome sequence data, ParascopyVC achieved higher precision (0.997) and recall (0.807) than three state-of-the-art variant callers (best precision = 0.956 for DeepVariant and best recall = 0.738 for GATK) in 167 LCR regions. Benchmarking of ParascopyVC using the genome-in-a-bottle high-confidence variant calls for HG002 genome showed that it achieved a very high precision of 0.991 and a high recall of 0.909 across LCR regions, significantly better than FreeBayes (precision = 0.954 and recall = 0.822), GATK (precision = 0.888 and recall = 0.873) and DeepVariant (precision = 0.983 and recall = 0.861). ParascopyVC demonstrated a consistently higher accuracy (mean F1 = 0.947) than other callers (best F1 = 0.908) across seven human genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ParascopyVC is implemented in Python and is freely available at https://github.com/tprodanov/ParascopyVC.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsSegmental Duplications, GenomicBenchmarkingGenome, HumanHumansWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37387146
PMCPMC10311303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.