ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationLow-copy repeats (LCRs) or segmental duplications are long segments of duplicated DNA that cover > 5% of the human genome. Existing tools for variant calling using short reads exhibit low accuracy in LCRs due to ambiguity in read mapping and extensive copy number variation. Variants in more than 150 genes overlapping LCRs are associated with risk for human diseases.
methodsWe describe a short-read variant calling method, ParascopyVC, that performs variant calling jointly across all repeat copies and utilizes reads independent of mapping quality in LCRs. To identify candidate variants, ParascopyVC aggregates reads mapped to different repeat copies and performs polyploid variant calling. Subsequently, paralogous sequence variants that can differentiate repeat copies are identified using population data and used for estimating the genotype of variants for each repeat copy.
resultsOn simulated whole-genome sequence data, ParascopyVC achieved higher precision (0.997) and recall (0.807) than three state-of-the-art variant callers (best precision = 0.956 for DeepVariant and best recall = 0.738 for GATK) in 167 LCR regions. Benchmarking of ParascopyVC using the genome-in-a-bottle high-confidence variant calls for HG002 genome showed that it achieved a very high precision of 0.991 and a high recall of 0.909 across LCR regions, significantly better than FreeBayes (precision = 0.954 and recall = 0.822), GATK (precision = 0.888 and recall = 0.873) and DeepVariant (precision = 0.983 and recall = 0.861). ParascopyVC demonstrated a consistently higher accuracy (mean F1 = 0.947) than other callers (best F1 = 0.908) across seven human genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ParascopyVC is implemented in Python and is freely available at https://github.com/tprodanov/ParascopyVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.