Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37387137›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Locality-preserving minimal perfect hashing of k-mers.

Giulio Ermanno Pibiri, Yoshihiro Shibuya, Antoine Limasset

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Fractional hitting sets for efficient multiset sketching.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficiency of Learned Indexes on Genome Spectra.LIPIcs : Leibniz international proceedings in informatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. aaHash: recursive amino acid sequence hashing.Bioinformatics advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulio Ermanno PibiriCa' Foscari University of Venice, Venice 30172, Italy.
Yoshihiro ShibuyaUniversity Gustave Eiffel, Marne-la-Vallée 77454, France.
Antoine LimassetUniversity of Lille, CRIStAL CNRS, UMR 9189 , Lille F-59000, France.

Funding

European Union's Horizon Europe 101093026French ANR AGATE ANR-21-CE45-0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMinimal perfect hashing is the problem of mapping a static set of n distinct keys into the address space {1,…,n} bijectively. It is well-known that n log 2(e) bits are necessary to specify a minimal perfect hash function (MPHF) f, when no additional knowledge of the input keys is to be used. However, it is often the case in practice that the input keys have intrinsic relationships that we can exploit to lower the bit complexity of f. For example, consider a string and the set of all its distinct k-mers as input keys: since two consecutive k-mers share an overlap of k-1 symbols, it seems possible to beat the classic  log 2(e) bits/key barrier in this case. Moreover, we would like f to map consecutive k-mers to consecutive addresses, as to also preserve as much as possible their relationship in the codomain. This is a useful feature in practice as it guarantees a certain degree of locality of reference for f, resulting in a better evaluation time when querying consecutive k-mers.

resultsMotivated by these premises, we initiate the study of a new type of locality-preserving MPHF designed for k-mers extracted consecutively from a collection of strings. We design a construction whose space usage decreases for growing k and discuss experiments with a practical implementation of the method: in practice, the functions built with our method can be several times smaller and even faster to query than the most efficient MPHFs in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID37387137
PMCPMC10311298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.