ArticleThe American journal of case reports2023
Presumed Unindicated Implantation of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractive surgery is one of the most frequently performed ocular surgeries worldwide. Implantation of the posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens has advantages over laser vision correction, especially in high refractive error cases. We present a case of a young adult women with poor vision who underwent bilateral posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens explantation due to high vault, shallow anterior chambers, and a picture of cone-rod dystrophy. CASE REPORT A 23-year-old woman was referred for poor vision following an implantation of bilateral toric implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation when she was 18 years old for high myopic astigmatism and anisometropia. On presentation, the best corrected visual acuity was 4-6/200 and 2-3/200 in the right eye and left eye, respectively. Slit lamp examination indicated a clear cornea with pigment deposition on the endothelium, high ICL vault, shallow anterior chamber, and bowing of the iris bilaterally. The patient underwent bilateral removal of the ICLs on separate visits, yet the vision remained unchanged. Diagnostics revealed that the patient had bull's eye maculopathy with atrophy due to her cone-rod dystrophy, which caused the poor vision. CONCLUSIONS This report emphasizes the need for careful and appropriate patient and intraocular size selection for refractive surgery. It indicates the importance of thorough medical examination, including genetic testing, fundus examination, and optical coherence tomography when retinal dystrophy is suspected. Generally, close follow-up is crucial in the setting of high vaulting following ICL implantation to prevent secondary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.