ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022
Opioid sparing effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine in orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- ERAS Protocol Elements and Neurosurgery-Specific Considerations: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- Dexmedetomidine attenuates nociceptive responses compared with propofol during intravenous sedation for dental surgery: a prospective observational study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
- The consensus statement of the Section of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy on anaesthesia in children over 3 years of age.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025Article
- PENG block in elderly patients with hip fracture: less is more? A prospective observational monocentric study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Minimizing Narcotic Use in Rhinoplasty: An Updated Narrative Review and Protocol.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries under Spinal Anesthesia: Benefits and Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Nerve Block for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Adding Dexmedetomidine to Methylene Blue in Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video-Assisted Lobectomy: A Case Series Study.Local and regional anesthesia · 2024Article
- Association of patient characteristics with postoperative opioid consumption following cesarean delivery: a single center retrospective study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024Article
- Monitored Anesthesia Care in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery-A Retrospective Case Series Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Review
- Effects of pharmacological therapy on sleep quality in a postoperative setting: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist without any effect on the GABA receptor. It provides an excellent sedative and analgesic profile with few side effects. We report our experience with dexmedetomidine use during orthopaedic surgery under locoregional anaesthesia to ensure adequate sedation and optimal postoperative pain control.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we included 128 patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery between January 2019 and December 2021. All patients received the same local anaesthetic dose of 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for axillary and supraclavicular block and 35 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + mepivacaine 0.5% for triple nerve block (femoral, obturator and sciatic nerve). The cohort was divided into two groups based on sedation drugs used during surgery (dexmedetomidine, or group D, vs midazolam, or group M). All patients received postoperative 24-h analgesia consisting of 60 mg of ketorolac, 200 mg of tramadol and 4 mg of ondansetron. The primary outcome measured how many patients in the two groups required an analgesic rescue dose of pethidine and the time to first pethidine administration. To reduce confounding, we included patients in two groups with non-statistically different demo-anamnestic parameters and who received the same dose of intraoperative local anaesthetic and postoperative analgesia.
resultsThe number of patients in group D who did not require a rescue dose of analgesia was significantly greater than in group M (49 vs 11, p < 0.001). Time-to-first postoperative opioid administration did not show a fundamental difference between the two groups under examination (523.75 ± 131.55 min vs 564 ± 117.84 min). Total opioid consumption was higher in the M group than in the D group (3529.8 ± 30.36 μg vs 1864.8 ± 31.59 μg, p 0.075), with a mean opioid consumption significantly higher in the M group than in the D group (26.26 ± 42.8 μg vs 69.21 ± 46.1 μg, p < 0.001): D group received 62.06% less opioid than M group.
conclusionsThe continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine during orthopaedic surgery performed under locoregional anaesthesia has been shown to increase the analgesic effect of local anaesthetics and reduce the consumption of major opioids in the postoperative period. Dexmedetomidine offers a unique ability to supply sedation and analgesia without respiratory depression, having a wide safety margin and an excellent sedative capacity. It does not increase the rate of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.