ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022
Potential survival benefit and early recovery from organ dysfunction with polymyxin B hemoperfusion: perspectives from a real-world big data analysis and the supporting mechanisms of action.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic changes in vasoactive-inotropic score and their prognostic value in severe sepsis and septic shock patients undergoing polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a real-world Asian ICU cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Sequential Versus Non-Sequential Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Real-World Cohort Analysis of Survival in an Asian ICU.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- FulminantCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Impact of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy on Outcomes in Septic Shock Patients Receiving Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- TIGRIS and EUPHRATES eventually join and provide new evidence: a narrative review of the polymyxin B hemoperfusion.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Real-World Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Seven-Year Single-Center Cohort Study from Taiwan.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endotoxin Hemoperfusion as an Adjuvant Therapy for Sepsis: Lessons from the TIGRIS Trial.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Review
- CatastrophicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Current perspectives in the management of sepsis and septic shock.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Endotoxic Septic Shock: Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndotoxin (ET) removal therapy with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used for the treatment of septic shock. Some observational studies reported clinical benefits, particularly in specific subgroups of patients. However, larger randomized controlled trial results have been disappointing. MAIN BODY: The four studies that revealed the survival benefit of PMX-HP were based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) national inpatient database (J-DPC study). Nevertheless, one J-DPC study and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in France evaluated PMX-HP in patients with abdominal septic shock and did not report a significant survival benefit. In both studies, the severity of illness was too low to find substantial significant differences in mortality. The results of the J-DPC studies further suggest that some subpopulations of patients could benefit from PMX-HP. Based on these results, this review revisited prior RCTs and other large-scale studies on PMX-HP. In addition, four J-DPC studies and one large-scale study reported a survival benefit with PMX-HP. A secondary analysis of the EUPHRATES trial, the most recent double-blinded RCT of PMX-HP conducted in North America, suggested a survival benefit in patients with high levels of endotoxemia. In the J-DPC studies and the EUPHRATES trial, ventilator-free days, vasoactive drug-free days, and renal replacement-free days were significantly improved in the PMX-HP groups. These findings suggest that PMX-HP can contribute to early recovery from organ dysfunction. The reduction of supportive care likely provides important health and economic benefits for managing patients with septic shock. Finally, the blood levels of mediators or biomarkers related to respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal dysfunction have been reported to be normalized with PMX-HP.
conclusionsThese results support the biological rationale for the improvement in organ dysfunction observed in the J-DPC studies and other large-scale studies, including the EUPHRATES trial. Real-world evidence from large data sets suggests an appropriate patient population that are likely to benefit from the utility of PMX-HP for septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.