Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386672›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022

Airway management for one lung ventilation during COVID-19 pandemic: a survey within Italian anesthesiologists.

Marco Rispoli, Federico Piccioni, Ida Di Giacinto, Gerardo Cortese, Stefano Falcetta, Domenico Massullo, Silvia Fiorelli, Ivana Zdravkovic, Cecilia Coccia, Giulio Rosboch and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco RispoliAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Vincenzo Monaldi Medical Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Federico PiccioniAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Critical and Supportive Care, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Ida Di GiacintoAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva Polivalente, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant'Orsola-Malpighi-Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
Gerardo CorteseAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenze AOU Citta della salute e della scienza, Torino, Italy.
Stefano FalcettaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Clinica di Anestesia e Rianimazione Ospedali Riunit, Ancona, Italy.
Domenico MassulloAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Silvia FiorelliAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. silvia.fiorelli@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-1199
Ivana ZdravkovicAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Casa di cura Gibiino, Catania, Italy.
Cecilia CocciaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, UOC Anestesia, Terapia Intensiva, IRCCS IFO "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Giulio RosbochAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Dipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenze AOU Citta della salute e della scienza, Torino, Italy.
Antonio CorcioneAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Vincenzo Monaldi Medical Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano SorbelloAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway management for thoracic surgery represents a high risk setting for SARS-CoV-2 infection diffusion due to complex and invasive airway instrumentation and techniques.

resultsAn 18-item questionnaire was submitted to the 56 members of the Thoracic subcommittee of the SIAARTI Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Research Group to provide a snapshot of current situation and national variability of devices and procedures for airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The response rate was 64%. Eighty-three percent of anesthetists declared that they modified their airway management strategies. The Hospital Management considered necessary to provide a complete level 3 personal protective equipment for thoracic anesthetists only in 47% of cases. Double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker were preferred by 53% and 22% of responders to achieve one-lung ventilation respectively. Over 90% of responders considered the videolaryngoscope with separate screen and rapid sequence induction/intubation useful to minimize the infection risk. Thirty-nine percent of participants considered mandatory the bronchoscopic check of airway devices. Vivasight-DL was considered comfortable by more than 50% of responders while protective box and plastic drape were judged as uncomfortable by most of anesthetists.

conclusionsThe survey reveals many changes in the clinical practice due to SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. A certain diffusion of new devices such as the VivaSight-DL and barrier enclosure systems emerged too. Finally, we found that most of Italian hospitals did not recognize thoracic anesthesia as a high-risk specialty for risk of virus diffusion.

Indexed as

Aerosol generating proceduresAirway managementBronchial blockersCOVID-19Lung separation

Identifiers

PMID37386672
PMCPMC8765104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.