Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386670›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022

The need for clinical ethics consultation: a monocentric observational survey study in the intensive care unit (Consul.E.T.I. study).

Matteo Filippini, Federico Nicoli, Mario Picozzi, Nicola Latronico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matteo FilippiniDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili, 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy. matteo.filippini123@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-6710
Federico NicoliCenter for Clinical Ethics, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Mario PicozziCenter for Clinical Ethics, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Nicola LatronicoDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili, 1, Brescia, 25123, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current organizational structure of the Italian healthcare system does not include the institutionalization of clinical ethics services. To describe the need for structured clinical ethics consultation services for ICU staff members in the intensive care unit (ICU), a monocentric observational survey study was performed utilizing a paper-based questionnaire.

resultsA total of 73 healthcare professionals (HCPs) responded out of a team of 84 people (87%). The results showed that the need for ethics consultation in the ICU is urgent, the institutionalization of the clinical ethics service is perceived as useful and should be a priority, and the issues on which the HCPs would like ethics consultation to focus are various and belong to "end of life" topics.

conclusionsHCPs believe that the clinical ethicist should become an integral part of ICU healthcare teams, offering consultations similar to the other specialistic consultations carried out in hospitals.

Indexed as

Clinical ethics consultationClinical ethics serviceIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID37386670
PMCPMC9473475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.