Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386615›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2023

Rationale and clinical application of antimicrobial stewardship principles in the intensive care unit: a multidisciplinary statement.

Andrea Cortegiani, Massimo Antonelli, Marco Falcone, Antonino Giarratano, Massimo Girardis, Marc Leone, Federico Pea, Stefania Stefani, Bruno Viaggi, Pierluigi Viale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evaluation of T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MRAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea CortegianiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy. andrea.cortegiani@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-9993
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco FalconeInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Antonino GiarratanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GirardisIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Marc LeoneDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, North Hospital, Marseille, France.
Federico PeaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania StefaniMicrobiology Section, Dept of Biomedical and Biotechnological Science, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Bruno ViaggiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Pierluigi VialeDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance represents a major critical issue for the management of the critically ill patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), since infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria are characterized by high morbidity and mortality, high rates of treatment failure, and increased healthcare costs worldwide. It is also well known that antimicrobial resistance can emerge as a result of inadequate antimicrobial therapy, in terms of drug selection and/or treatment duration. The application of antimicrobial stewardship principles in ICUs improves the quality of antimicrobial therapy management. However, it needs specific considerations related to the critical setting.

methodsThe aim of this consensus document gathering a multidisciplinary panel of experts was to discuss principles of antimicrobial stewardship in ICU and to produce statements that facilitate their clinical application and optimize their effectiveness. The methodology used was a modified nominal group discussion.

conclusionThe final set of statements underlined the importance of the specific interpretation of antimicrobial stewardship's principles in critically ill patient management, quasi-targeted therapy, the use of rapid diagnostic methods, the personalization of antimicrobial therapies' duration, obtaining microbiological surveillance data, the use of PK/PD targets, and the use of specific indicators in antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial stewardshipInfectionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37386615
PMCPMC10245548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.