Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386611›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022

Pediatric anesthesia and achalasia: 10 years' experience in peroral endoscopy myotomy management.

Fabio Sbaraglia, Pietro Familiari, Federica Maiellare, Marco Mecarello, Annamaria Scarano, Demetrio Del Prete, Rosa Lamacchia, Federica Antonicelli, Marco Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabio SbaragliaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy. fabiosbaraglia@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-264X
Pietro FamiliariDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Federica MaiellareDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Marco MecarelloDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Annamaria ScaranoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Demetrio Del PreteDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Rosa LamacchiaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Federica AntonicelliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Marco RossiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic treatment for achalasia (POEM) is a recently introduced technique that incorporates the concepts of natural orifice transluminal surgery. Although pediatric achalasia is rare, POEM has been episodically used in children since 2012. Despite this procedure entails many implications for airway management and mechanical ventilation, evidences about anesthesiologic management are very poor. We conducted this retrospective study to pay attention on the clinical challenge for pediatric anesthesiologists. We put special emphasis on the risk in intubation maneuvers and in ventilation settings.

resultsWe retrieved data on children 18 years old and younger who underwent POEM in a single tertiary referral endoscopic center between 2012 and 2021. Demographics, clinical history, fasting status, anesthesia induction, airway management, anesthesia maintenance, timing of anesthesia and procedure, PONV, and pain treatment and adverse events were retrieved from the original database. Thirty-one patients (3-18 years) undergoing POEM for achalasia were analyzed. In 30 of the 31 patients, rapid sequence induction was performed. All patients manifested consequences of endoscopic CO

conclusionsPOEM procedure seems to be characterized by a low-risk profile, but specials precaution must be taken. The inhalation risk is actually due to the high rate of full esophagus patients, even if the Rapid Sequence Induction was effective in preventing ab ingestis pneumonia. Mechanical ventilation may be difficult during the tunnelization step. Future prospective trials will be necessary to individuate the better choices in such a special setting.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsEndoscopyMechanical ventilationPediatric anesthesiaRapid sequence induction

Identifiers

PMID37386611
PMCPMC10245425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.