Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386559›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2022

Opioid-free anesthesia in oncologic surgery: the rules of the game.

Alessandro De Cassai, Federico Geraldini, Serkan Tulgar, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Edward R Mariano, Burhan Dost, Pierfrancesco Fusco, Gian Marco Petroni, Fabio Costa, Paolo Navalesi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandro De CassaiUOC Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 1, 35127, Padua, Italy. alessandro.decassai@aopd.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-1832
Federico GeraldiniUOC Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 1, 35127, Padua, Italy.
Serkan TulgarSamsun University Faculty of Medicine, Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Samsun, Turkey.
Ali AhiskaliogluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Edward R MarianoAnesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Burhan DostDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Pierfrancesco FuscoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, San Salvatore Academic Hospital of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Gian Marco PetroniDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Fabio CostaUnit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiUOC Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani 1, 35127, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioids are frequently used in the postoperative period due to their analgesic properties. While these drugs reduce nociceptive somatic, visceral, and neuropathic pain, they may also lead to undesirable effects such as respiratory depression, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, constipation, itching, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, tolerance, addiction, and immune system disorders. Anesthesiologists are in the critical position of finding balance between using opioids when they are necessary and implementing opioid-sparing strategies to avoid the known harmful effects. This article aims to give an overview of opioid-free anesthesia. MAIN BODY: This paper presents an overview of opioid-free anesthesia and opioid-sparing anesthetic techniques. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are discussed, highlighting the possible advantages and drawbacks of each approach.

conclusionsChoosing the best anesthetic protocol for a patient undergoing cancer surgery is not an easy task and the available literature provides no definitive answers. In our opinion, opioid-sparing strategies should always be implemented in routine practice and opioid-free anesthesia should be considered whenever possible. Non-pharmacological strategies such as patient education, while generally underrepresented in scientific literature, may warrant consideration in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCancerOpioidsReview

Identifiers

PMID37386559
PMCPMC10245431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.