Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386484›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2023

Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.

Filipa Alves da Costa, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Adriana Ramos, Alexandra Mayer, Claudia Brito, Catarina Ramos, Catarina Bernardo, Mariane Cossito, Cláudia Furtado, Arlindo R Ferreira and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Filipa Alves da CostaRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal. alvesdacosta.f@gmail.com.
Fábio Cardoso BorgesRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Adriana RamosRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandra MayerRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Claudia BritoRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina RamosRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Catarina BernardoRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mariane CossitoDireção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal.
Cláudia FurtadoDireção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal.
Arlindo R FerreiraUnidade de Mama, Centro Clínico Champalimaud, Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal.
Diogo Martins-BrancoServiço de Oncologia Médica, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana da Costa MirandaRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
António LourençoRegisto Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ordem dos Médicos · PTInstitut Jules Bordet · BEInstituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2.

methodsA population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to  adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used.

resultsThere were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%).

conclusionsData suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPiperazinesPyridinesRetrospective StudiesAromatase InhibitorspalbociclibPiperazinesPyridinesCancer registryEffectivenessPalbociclibSafety

Identifiers

PMID37386484
PMCPMC10308630
OpenAlexW4382630959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.