Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386462›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2023

Clinical insight among persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with amisulpride, aripiprazole or olanzapine: a semi-randomised trial.

L A Stabell, E Johnsen, R A Kroken, E M Løberg, A Blindheim, I Joa, S K Reitan, M Rettenbacher, P Munk-Jørgensen, R Gjestad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01446328 (Bergen Psychosis Project 2 - The Bergen-Stavanger-Innsbruck-Trondheim Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01446328 phase4completednot on this map

Bergen Psychosis Project 2 - The Bergen-Stavanger-Innsbruck-Trondheim Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2011 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSchizophrenia, Psychotic DisordersArmsAmisulpride, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

L A StabellDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. lena.antonsen.stabell@helse-bergen.no.
E JohnsenDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
R A KrokenDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
E M LøbergDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
A BlindheimDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
I JoaNetwork for Clinical Research in psychosis, TIPS, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
S K ReitanDepartment of Mental Health, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
M RettenbacherDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, Innsbruck, Austria.
P Munk-JørgensenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
R GjestadDivision of Psychiatry and NORMENT Centre of Excellence, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOInnsbruck Medical University · ATStavanger University Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic treatment may improve clinical insight. However, previous studies have reported inconclusive findings on whether antipsychotics improve insight over and above the reduction in symptoms of psychosis. These studies assessed homogeneous samples in terms of stage of illness. Randomised studies investigating a mixed population of first- and multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders might clarify this disagreement.

methodsOur data were derived from a pragmatic, rater-blinded, semi-randomised trial that compared the effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine. A sample of 144 patients with first- or multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders underwent eight assessments during a 1-year follow-up. Clinical insight was assessed by item General 12 from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We analysed latent growth curve models to test if the medications had a direct effect on insight that was over and above the reduction in total psychosis symptoms. Furthermore, we investigated whether there were differences between the study drugs in terms of insight.

resultsBased on allocation analysis, all three drugs were associated with a reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the initial phase (weeks 0-6). Amisulpride and olanzapine were associated with improved insight over and above what was related to the reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the long-term phase (weeks 6-52). However, these differential effects were lost when only including the participants that chose the first drug in the randomisation sequence. We found no differential effect on insight among those who were antipsychotic-naïve and those who were previously medicated with antipsychotics.

conclusionsOur results suggest that antipsychotic treatment improves insight, but whether the effect on insight surpasses the effect of reduced total psychosis symptoms is more uncertain.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01446328, 05.10.2011.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsSchizophreniaAmisulprideAripiprazoleHumansOlanzapineAmisulprideAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleOlanzapineAntipsychotic-naïveAntipsychoticsEffectivenessInsightLongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID37386462
PMCPMC10311854
OpenAlexW4382632180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.