Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37386442›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023

Machine learning applications on neonatal sepsis treatment: a scoping review.

Colleen O'Sullivan, Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai, Ian Chang-Yen Wu, Emanuela Boselli, Carmel Hughes, Deepak Padmanabhan, Yingfen Hsia

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colleen O'SullivanSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. cosullivan07@qub.ac.uk.
Daniel Hsiang-Te TsaiCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
Ian Chang-Yen WuCentre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
Emanuela BoselliDepartment of Pediatrics, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carmel HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Deepak PadmanabhanSchool of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Yingfen HsiaSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeonatal sepsis is a major cause of health loss and mortality worldwide. Without proper treatment, neonatal sepsis can quickly develop into multisystem organ failure. However, the signs of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, and treatment is labour-intensive and expensive. Moreover, antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat globally, and it has been reported that over 70% of neonatal bloodstream infections are resistant to first-line antibiotic treatment. Machine learning is a potential tool to aid clinicians in diagnosing infections and in determining the most appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, as has been demonstrated for adult populations. This review aimed to present the application of machine learning on neonatal sepsis treatment.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published in English focusing on neonatal sepsis, antibiotics, and machine learning.

resultsThere were 18 studies included in this scoping review. Three studies focused on using machine learning in antibiotic treatment for bloodstream infections, one focused on predicting in-hospital mortality associated with neonatal sepsis, and the remaining studies focused on developing machine learning prediction models to diagnose possible sepsis cases. Gestational age, C-reactive protein levels, and white blood cell count were important predictors to diagnose neonatal sepsis. Age, weight, and days from hospital admission to blood sample taken were important to predict antibiotic-resistant infections. The best-performing machine learning models were random forest and neural networks.

conclusionDespite the threat antimicrobial resistance poses, there was a lack of studies focusing on the use of machine learning for aiding empirical antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis.

Indexed as

Neonatal SepsisSepsisAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsGestational AgeHumansHydrolasesInfant, NewbornMachine LearningAnti-Bacterial AgentsHydrolasesAntibioticAntimicrobial ResistanceBloodstream InfectionMachine LearningNeonate

Identifiers

PMID37386442
PMCPMC10308703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.