ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023
Machine learning applications on neonatal sepsis treatment: a scoping review.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The intelligent neonatal healthcare: a systematic review of machine learning architectures integrating the internet of medical things and blockchain.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and Imaging Data-based Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis.Current medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal : Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Guideline
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Culture-Confirmed Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Neonatal Bloodstream Infections: A Narrative Review on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges and Prospects in Developing Countries.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Patient Benefits in the Context of Sepsis-Related AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of neonatal sepsis diagnostic nomograms: a single-site retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Equity-centred, nurse-led implementation of artificial intelligence in community maternal and child health nursing: a conceptual framework for low-resource settings.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Transforming neonatal care through informatics: A review of artificial intelligence, data, and implementation considerations.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
- Article
- Aligning prediction models with clinical information needs: infant sepsis case study.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- AI Algorithms for Modeling the Risk, Progression, and Treatment of Sepsis, Including Early-Onset Sepsis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Struggling to Understand the NEC Spectrum-Could the Integration of Metabolomics, Clinical-Laboratory Data, and Other Emerging Technologies Help Diagnosis?Metabolites · 2024Review
- Neonatal Infectious Disease: A Major Contributor to Infant Mortality Requiring Advances in Point-of-Care Diagnosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Machine Learning: A Potential Therapeutic Tool to Facilitate Neonatal Therapeutic Decision Making.Paediatric drugs · 2024Review
- Tackling the Antimicrobial Resistance "Pandemic" with Machine Learning Tools: A Summary of Available Evidence.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Maternal perinatal risk factors and full-term neonatal early-onset sepsis: A novel prediction model based on machine learning.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNeonatal sepsis is a major cause of health loss and mortality worldwide. Without proper treatment, neonatal sepsis can quickly develop into multisystem organ failure. However, the signs of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, and treatment is labour-intensive and expensive. Moreover, antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat globally, and it has been reported that over 70% of neonatal bloodstream infections are resistant to first-line antibiotic treatment. Machine learning is a potential tool to aid clinicians in diagnosing infections and in determining the most appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, as has been demonstrated for adult populations. This review aimed to present the application of machine learning on neonatal sepsis treatment.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published in English focusing on neonatal sepsis, antibiotics, and machine learning.
resultsThere were 18 studies included in this scoping review. Three studies focused on using machine learning in antibiotic treatment for bloodstream infections, one focused on predicting in-hospital mortality associated with neonatal sepsis, and the remaining studies focused on developing machine learning prediction models to diagnose possible sepsis cases. Gestational age, C-reactive protein levels, and white blood cell count were important predictors to diagnose neonatal sepsis. Age, weight, and days from hospital admission to blood sample taken were important to predict antibiotic-resistant infections. The best-performing machine learning models were random forest and neural networks.
conclusionDespite the threat antimicrobial resistance poses, there was a lack of studies focusing on the use of machine learning for aiding empirical antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.